Clustered Calibration: Representation-Aware Probability Calibration via Learned Subpopulations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Ensuring that predicted probabilities align with observed frequencies is critical in high-stakes domains such as clinical decision support, autonomous driving and financial risk assessment. Existing calibration methods typically apply a single global transformation or rely on post-hoc binning over predicted confidences, limiting their ability to exploit heterogeneous reliability across sub-populations. We propose Clustered Calibration, a representation-aware framework that identifies sub-populations via clustering in learned feature spaces (e.g., coverage vectors, SHAP values, CNN activations, Transformer embeddings) and fits a soft mixture of cluster-specific parametric calibrators under hierarchical shrinkage toward a global mapping. This design yields context-specific calibration while maintaining global stability. Across six tabular datasets and additional image and text benchmarks, clustered calibration consistently improves or matches strong global calibrators in terms of negative log-likelihood and Brier score, while preserving AUC and accuracy. We further show, both analytically and empirically, that fixed-bin Expected Calibration Error (ECE) can mis-rank soft, region-aware calibrators even when proper scoring rules improve, and we advocate for log-loss and Brier as more reliable bases for model selection in such settings.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Oct 2025.
Builds on
20 of 47 references.
References · 20
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
- 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,960
- 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,307
- 2019How Contextual are Contextualized Word Representations? Comparing the Geometry of BERT, ELMo, and GPT-2 Embeddingscited by 784
- 2015Unsupervised Deep Embedding for Clustering Analysiscited by 767
- 2021MedMNIST v2 -- A large-scale lightweight benchmark for 2D and 3D biomedical image classificationcited by 690
- 2021Revisiting the Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 390
- 2019Beyond temperature scaling: Obtaining well-calibrated multiclass probabilities with Dirichlet calibrationcited by 364
- 2019Verified Uncertainty Calibrationcited by 309
- 2016Towards K-means-friendly Spaces: Simultaneous Deep Learning and Clusteringcited by 237
8 more
- 2020Mix-n-Match: Ensemble and Compositional Methods for Uncertainty Calibration in Deep Learningcited by 190
- 2020Mitigating Bias in Calibration Error Estimationcited by 101
- 2021Calibrating Predictions to Decisions: A Novel Approach to Multi-Class Calibrationcited by 79
- 2015Posterior calibration and exploratory analysis for natural language processing modelscited by 76
- 2021Local Calibration: Metrics and Recalibrationcited by 24
- 2019Bin-wise Temperature Scaling (BTS): Improvement in Confidence Calibration Performance through Simple Scaling Techniquescited by 23
- 2017DeepSafe: A Data-driven Approach for Checking Adversarial Robustness in Neural Networkscited by 20
- 2025Can a calibration metric be both testable and actionable?cited by 12
Built on by
Not cited yet.