Geodesic Distance Descriptors
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The Gromov-Hausdorff (GH) distance is traditionally used for measuring distances between metric spaces. It is defined as the minimal distortion of embedding one surface into the other, while the optimal correspondence can be described as the map that minimizes this distortion. Solving such a minimization is a hard combinatorial problem that requires pre-computation and storing of all pairwise geodesic distances for the matched surfaces. A popular way for compact representation of functions on surfaces is by projecting them into the leading eigenfunctions of the Laplace-Beltrami Operator (LBO). When truncated, The basis of the LBO is known to be the optimal for representing functions with bounded gradient in a min-max sense. Methods such as Spectral-GMDS exploit this idea to simplify and efficiently approximate a minimization related to the GH distance by operating in the truncated spectral domain, and obtain state of the art results for matching of nearly isometric shapes. However, when considering only a specific set of functions on the surface, such as geodesic distances, an optimized basis could be considered as an even better alternative. Here, we define the geodesic distance basis, which is optimal for compact approximation of geodesic distances, in terms of Frobenius norm. We use the suggested basis to extract the Geodesic Distance Descriptor (GDD), which encodes the geodesic distances information as a linear combination of the basis functions. We then show how these ideas can be used to efficiently and accurately approximate the metric spaces matching problem with almost no loss of information. These observations are used to construct a very simple and efficient procedure for shape correspondence. Experimental results show that the GDD improves both accuracy and efficiency of state of the art shape matching procedures.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 21 Nov 2016.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 2; 2023: 0; 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
10 papers.
- 2021HumanGPS: Geodesic PreServing Feature for Dense Human Correspondencescited by 12
- 2022GraphWalks: Efficient Shape Agnostic Geodesic Shortest Path Estimationcited by 8
- 2022Learning Geodesic-Aware Local Features from RGB-D Imagescited by 5
- 2025Surface-Aware Distilled 3D Semantic Featurescited by 5
- 2025MoReMouse: Monocular Reconstruction of Laboratory Mousecited by 1
- 2026Deep Accurate Solver for the Geodesic Problemcited by 1
- 2021U-mesh: Human Correspondence Matching with Mesh Convolutional Networkscited by 0
- 2024A Spectral Framework for Evaluating Geodesic Distances Between Graphscited by 0
- 2024Predictive Query-based Pipeline for Graph Datacited by 0
- 2026Beyond Seen Bounds: Class-Centric Polarization for Single-Domain Generalized Deep Metric Learningcited by 0
- 2026Deep Accurate Solver for the Geodesic Problem25 Feb 2026
- 2026Beyond Seen Bounds: Class-Centric Polarization for Single-Domain Generalized Deep Metric Learning14 Jan 2026
- 2025MoReMouse: Monocular Reconstruction of Laboratory Mouse6 Jul 2025
- 2025Surface-Aware Distilled 3D Semantic Features24 Mar 2025
- 2024Predictive Query-based Pipeline for Graph Data13 Dec 2024
- 2024A Spectral Framework for Evaluating Geodesic Distances Between Graphs15 Jun 2024
- 2022GraphWalks: Efficient Shape Agnostic Geodesic Shortest Path Estimation30 May 2022
- 2022Learning Geodesic-Aware Local Features from RGB-D Images22 Mar 2022
- 2021U-mesh: Human Correspondence Matching with Mesh Convolutional Networks15 Aug 2021
- 2021HumanGPS: Geodesic PreServing Feature for Dense Human Correspondences29 Mar 2021