mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Greedy Approach to Adapting the Trace Parameter for Temporal Difference Learning

arXiv 1607.00446 ↗First posted 2 Jul 2016cs.AI cs.LG stat.MLcited by 20

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

One of the main obstacles to broad application of reinforcement learning methods is the parameter sensitivity of our core learning algorithms. In many large-scale applications, online computation and function approximation represent key strategies in scaling up reinforcement learning algorithms. In this setting, we have effective and reasonably well understood algorithms for adapting the learning-rate parameter, online during learning. Such meta-learning approaches can improve robustness of learning and enable specialization to current task, improving learning speed. For temporal-difference learning algorithms which we study here, there is yet another parameter, λ, that similarly impacts learning speed and stability in practice. Unfortunately, unlike the learning-rate parameter, λ parametrizes the objective function that temporal-difference methods optimize. Different choices of λ produce different fixed-point solutions, and thus adapting λ online and characterizing the optimization is substantially more complex than adapting the learning-rate parameter. There are no meta-learning method for λ that can achieve (1) incremental updating, (2) compatibility with function approximation, and (3) maintain stability of learning under both on and off-policy sampling. In this paper we contribute a novel objective function for optimizing λ as a function of state rather than time. We derive a new incremental, linear complexity λ-adaption algorithm that does not require offline batch updating or access to a model of the world, and present a suite of experiments illustrating the practicality of our new algorithm in three different settings. Taken together, our contributions represent a concrete step towards black-box application of temporal-difference learning methods in real world problems.

Key facts. Cited by 20 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 2 Jul 2016.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 6; 2022: 4; 2023: 1; 2024: 6; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

20 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2022Automated Reinforcement Learning (AutoRL): A Survey and Open Problemscited by 69
  2. 2024Streaming Deep Reinforcement Learning Finally Workscited by 24
  3. 2023The Statistical Benefits of Quantile Temporal-Difference Learning for Value Estimationcited by 14
  4. 2021Automated Deep Learning: Neural Architecture Search Is Not the Endcited by 13
  5. 2021Variance Penalized On-Policy and Off-Policy Actor-Criticcited by 10
  6. 2022Automated Reinforcement Learning: An Overviewcited by 9
  7. 2024Position: Lifetime tuning is incompatible with continual reinforcement learningcited by 9
  8. 2021High-Confidence Off-Policy (or Counterfactual) Variance Estimationcited by 8
  9. 2021Preferential Temporal Difference Learningcited by 6
  10. 2022No More Pesky Hyperparameters: Offline Hyperparameter Tuning for RLcited by 6
  11. 2025Uncertainty Prioritized Experience Replaycited by 5
  12. 2022Selective Credit Assignmentcited by 4
8 more
  1. 2024Adaptive Q-Network: On-the-fly Target Selection for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3
  2. 2024Demystifying the Recency Heuristic in Temporal-Difference Learningcited by 3
  3. 2024Highway Reinforcement Learningcited by 2
  4. 2024Sequence Compression Speeds Up Credit Assignment in Reinforcement Learningcited by 1
  5. 2026Value Bonuses using Ensemble Errors for Exploration in Reinforcement Learningcited by 1
  6. 2021Greedy-Step Off-Policy Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
  7. 2021Automatic tuning of hyper-parameters of reinforcement learning algorithms using Bayesian optimization with behavioral cloningcited by 0
  8. 2026Revisiting Adam for Streaming Reinforcement Learningcited by 0