mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A segmental framework for fully-unsupervised large-vocabulary speech recognition

arXiv 1606.06950 ↗First posted 22 Jun 2016cs.CL cs.LGcited by 27

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Zero-resource speech technology is a growing research area that aims to develop methods for speech processing in the absence of transcriptions, lexicons, or language modelling text. Early term discovery systems focused on identifying isolated recurring patterns in a corpus, while more recent full-coverage systems attempt to completely segment and cluster the audio into word-like units---effectively performing unsupervised speech recognition. This article presents the first attempt we are aware of to apply such a system to large-vocabulary multi-speaker data. Our system uses a Bayesian modelling framework with segmental word representations: each word segment is represented as a fixed-dimensional acoustic embedding obtained by mapping the sequence of feature frames to a single embedding vector. We compare our system on English and Xitsonga datasets to state-of-the-art baselines, using a variety of measures including word error rate (obtained by mapping the unsupervised output to ground truth transcriptions). Very high word error rates are reported---in the order of 70--80% for speaker-dependent and 80--95% for speaker-independent systems---highlighting the difficulty of this task. Nevertheless, in terms of cluster quality and word segmentation metrics, we show that by imposing a consistent top-down segmentation while also using bottom-up knowledge from detected syllable boundaries, both single-speaker and multi-speaker versions of our system outperform a purely bottom-up single-speaker syllable-based approach. We also show that the discovered clusters can be made less speaker- and gender-specific by using an unsupervised autoencoder-like feature extractor to learn better frame-level features (prior to embedding). Our system's discovered clusters are still less pure than those of unsupervised term discovery systems, but provide far greater coverage.

Key facts. Cited by 27 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 22 Jun 2016.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 7; 2022: 7; 2023: 7; 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

27 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2022Self-Supervised Speech Representation Learning: A Reviewcited by 258
  2. 2021Unsupervised Speech Recognitioncited by 147
  3. 2022Word Discovery in Visually Grounded, Self-Supervised Speech Modelscited by 37
  4. 2022Self-supervised language learning from raw audio: Lessons from the Zero Resource Speech Challengecited by 34
  5. 2021Segmental Contrastive Predictive Coding for Unsupervised Word Segmentationcited by 32
  6. 2022Word Segmentation on Discovered Phone Units with Dynamic Programming and Self-Supervised Scoringcited by 24
  7. 2023End-to-End Simultaneous Speech Translation with Differentiable Segmentationcited by 22
  8. 2022Analyzing Acoustic Word Embeddings from Pre-trained Self-supervised Speech Modelscited by 21
  9. 2022Variable-rate hierarchical CPC leads to acoustic unit discovery in speechcited by 13
  10. 2022DP-Parse: Finding Word Boundaries from Raw Speech with an Instance Lexiconcited by 12
  11. 2021Deciphering Speech: a Zero-Resource Approach to Cross-Lingual Transfer in ASRcited by 11
  12. 2021Double Articulation Analyzer with Prosody for Unsupervised Word and Phoneme Discoverycited by 7
15 more
  1. 2023Unsupervised Word Segmentation Using Temporal Gradient Pseudo-Labelscited by 7
  2. 2021On the Difficulty of Segmenting Words with Attentioncited by 6
  3. 2023Unified Segment-to-Segment Framework for Simultaneous Sequence Generationcited by 6
  4. 2024Unsupervised Word Discovery: Boundary Detection with Clustering vs. Dynamic Programmingcited by 6
  5. 2025IPA-CHILDES & G2P+: Feature-Rich Resources for Cross-Lingual Phonology and Phonemic Language Modelingcited by 6
  6. 2021Unsupervised Automatic Speech Recognition: A Reviewcited by 5
  7. 2025Should Top-Down Clustering Affect Boundaries in Unsupervised Word Discovery?cited by 4
  8. 2021Towards Tokenized Human Dynamics Representationcited by 3
  9. 2023Acoustic Word Embeddings for Untranscribed Target Languages with Continued Pretraining and Learned Poolingcited by 2
  10. 2023Audio-Visual Neural Syntax Acquisitioncited by 2
  11. 2023Towards Matching Phones and Speech Representationscited by 1
  12. 2024A Simple HMM with Self-Supervised Representations for Phone Segmentationcited by 1
  13. 2026Revisiting Lexicon Evaluation in Unsupervised Word Discoverycited by 1
  14. 2023Speech representation learning: Learning bidirectional encoders with single-view, multi-view, and multi-task methodscited by 0
  15. 2026Clustering Unsupervised Representations as Defense against Poisoning Attacks on Speech Commands Classification Systemcited by 0