The Menu-Size Complexity of Revenue Approximation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Consider a monopolist selling n items to an additive buyer whose item values are drawn from independent distributions F1,F2,ldots,Fn possibly having unbounded support. Unlike in the single-item case, it is well known that the revenue-optimal selling mechanism (a pricing scheme) may be complex, sometimes requiring a continuum of menu entries. Also known is that simple mechanisms with a bounded number of menu entries can extract a constant fraction of the optimal revenue. Nonetheless, whether an arbitrarily high fraction of the optimal revenue can be extracted via a bounded menu size remained open. We give an affirmative answer: for every n and varepsilon>0, there exists C=C(n,varepsilon) s.t. mechanisms of menu size at most C suffice for obtaining (1-varepsilon) of the optimal revenue from any F1,ldots,Fn. We prove upper and lower bounds on the revenue-approximation complexity C(n,varepsilon) and on the deterministic communication complexity required to run a mechanism achieving such an approximation.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 22 Apr 2016.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 2.
3 papers.
- 2023Mode Connectivity in Auction Designcited by 3
- 2021Recommender Systems meet Mechanism Designcited by 2
- 2023A Robust Multi-Item Auction Design with Statistical Learningcited by 0
- 2023Mode Connectivity in Auction Design18 May 2023
- 2023A Robust Multi-Item Auction Design with Statistical Learning2 Feb 2023
- 2021Recommender Systems meet Mechanism Design25 Oct 2021