mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Fairness Constraints: Mechanisms for Fair Classification

arXiv 1507.05259 ↗First posted 19 Jul 2015stat.ML cs.LGcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Algorithmic decision making systems are ubiquitous across a wide variety of online as well as offline services. These systems rely on complex learning methods and vast amounts of data to optimize the service functionality, satisfaction of the end user and profitability. However, there is a growing concern that these automated decisions can lead, even in the absence of intent, to a lack of fairness, i.e., their outcomes can disproportionately hurt (or, benefit) particular groups of people sharing one or more sensitive attributes (e.g., race, sex). In this paper, we introduce a flexible mechanism to design fair classifiers by leveraging a novel intuitive measure of decision boundary (un)fairness. We instantiate this mechanism with two well-known classifiers, logistic regression and support vector machines, and show on real-world data that our mechanism allows for a fine-grained control on the degree of fairness, often at a small cost in terms of accuracy.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 19 Jul 2015.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 3; 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

10 papers.