mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Smooth Strongly Convex Interpolation and Exact Worst-case Performance of First-order Methods

arXiv 1502.05666 ↗First posted 19 Feb 2015math.OCcited by 36

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We show that the exact worst-case performance of fixed-step first-order methods for unconstrained optimization of smooth (possibly strongly) convex functions can be obtained by solving convex programs. Finding the worst-case performance of a black-box first-order method is formulated as an optimization problem over a set of smooth (strongly) convex functions and initial conditions. We develop closed-form necessary and sufficient conditions for smooth (strongly) convex interpolation, which provide a finite representation for those functions. This allows us to reformulate the worst-case performance estimation problem as an equivalent finite dimension-independent semidefinite optimization problem, whose exact solution can be recovered up to numerical precision. Optimal solutions to this performance estimation problem provide both worst-case performance bounds and explicit functions matching them, as our smooth (strongly) convex interpolation procedure is constructive. Our works build on those of Drori and Teboulle in [Math. Prog. 145 (1-2), 2014] who introduced and solved relaxations of the performance estimation problem for smooth convex functions. We apply our approach to different fixed-step first-order methods with several performance criteria, including objective function accuracy and gradient norm. We conjecture several numerically supported worst-case bounds on the performance of the fixed-step gradient, fast gradient and optimized gradient methods, both in the smooth convex and the smooth strongly convex cases, and deduce tight estimates of the optimal step size for the gradient method.

Key facts. Cited by 36 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 19 Feb 2015.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 5; 2022: 1; 2023: 4; 2024: 5; 2025: 9; 2026: 12.

36 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2021Extragradient Method: O(1/K) Last-Iterate Convergence for Monotone Variational Inequalities and Connections With Cocoercivitycited by 39
  2. 2023Learning to Warm-Start Fixed-Point Optimization Algorithmscited by 32
  3. 2025The Surprising Agreement Between Convex Optimization Theory and Learning-Rate Scheduling for Large Model Trainingcited by 31
  4. 2023Provably Faster Gradient Descent via Long Stepscited by 20
  5. 2022PEPit: computer-assisted worst-case analyses of first-order optimization methods in Pythoncited by 10
  6. 2025Negative Stepsizes Make Gradient-Descent-Ascent Convergecited by 9
  7. 2024Anytime Acceleration of Gradient Descentcited by 7
  8. 2024The Sample Complexity of Gradient Descent in Stochastic Convex Optimizationcited by 5
  9. 2024Data-Driven Performance Guarantees for Classical and Learned Optimizerscited by 5
  10. 2024Accelerated Preference Optimization for Large Language Model Alignmentcited by 5
  11. 2021Practical Schemes for Finding Near-Stationary Points of Convex Finite-Sumscited by 4
  12. 2023A Nonstochastic Control Approach to Optimizationcited by 4
24 more
  1. 2026A lower bound for stepsize-based acceleration of gradient descentcited by 4
  2. 2021On Centralized and Distributed Mirror Descent: Convergence Analysis Using Quadratic Constraintscited by 2
  3. 2025Bias-Optimal Bounds for SGD: A Computer-Aided Lyapunov Analysiscited by 2
  4. 2025Several Performance Bounds on Decentralized Online Optimization are Highly Conservative and Potentially Misleadingcited by 2
  5. 2026Improved Gradient Descent Lower Bounds Beyond Nesterovcited by 2
  6. 2021OpReg-Boost: Learning to Accelerate Online Algorithms with Operator Regressioncited by 1
  7. 2023Extragradient Type Methods for Riemannian Variational Inequality Problemscited by 1
  8. 2025Tight analyses of first-order methods with error feedbackcited by 1
  9. 2025Analysis of Schedule-Free Nonconvex Optimizationcited by 1
  10. 2026Silver Rate Is (Almost) Optimal for Gradient Descentcited by 1
  11. 2021Accelerating Perturbed Stochastic Iterates in Asynchronous Lock-Free Optimizationcited by 0
  12. 2024Generalized Continuous-Time Models for Nesterov's Accelerated Gradient Methodscited by 0
  13. 2025Interpolation Conditions for Data Consistency and Prediction in Noisy Linear Systemscited by 0
  14. 2025Empirical and computer-aided robustness analysis of long-step and accelerated methods in smooth convex optimizationcited by 0
  15. 2025Convexity of Optimization Curves: Local Sharp Thresholds, Robustness Impossibility, and New Counterexamplescited by 0
  16. 2026Step-Size Stability in Stochastic Optimization: A Theoretical Perspectivecited by 0
  17. 2026Accelerating Optimization and Machine Learning through Decentralizationcited by 0
  18. 2026A Tight Theory of Error Feedback Algorithms in Distributed Optimizationcited by 0
  19. 2026Uniform Stability and Generalization Error of GD and SGD on Fixed-Point Parameterscited by 0
  20. 2026Causal Optimizer Interaction Calculus: Hidden Geometric Relaxation and Identifiable Interventionscited by 0
  21. 2026Entropy-Smooth Convex Optimization Cannot Be Acceleratedcited by 0
  22. 2026Mirror descent algorithms with logarithmic barrierscited by 0
  23. 2026Lower Bounds for Linear-Oracle Online Learningcited by 0
  24. 2026The Row Normalization Puzzle in Muoncited by 0