Bias-Optimal Bounds for SGD: A Computer-Aided Lyapunov Analysis
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The non-asymptotic analysis of Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) typically yields bounds that decompose into a bias term and a variance term. In this work, we focus on the bias component and study the extent to which SGD can match the optimal convergence behavior of deterministic gradient descent. Assuming only (strong) convexity and smoothness of the objective, we derive new bounds that are bias-optimal, in the sense that the bias term coincides with the worst-case rate of gradient descent. Our results hold for the full range of constant step-sizes γ L ∈ (0,2), including critical and large step-size regimes that were previously unexplored without additional variance assumptions. The bounds are obtained through the construction of a simple Lyapunov energy whose monotonicity yields sharp convergence guarantees. To design the parameters of this energy, we employ the Performance Estimation Problem framework, which we also use to provide numerical evidence for the optimality of the associated variance terms.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 May 2025.
Builds on
29 of 50 references.
References · 29
- 2021Convex optimizationcited by 2,515
- 2016Optimization Methods for Large-Scale Machine Learningcited by 1,150
- 2019SGD: General Analysis and Improved Ratescited by 207
- 2023Handbook of Convergence Theorems for (Stochastic) Gradient Methodscited by 163
- 2018Stochastic model-based minimization of weakly convex functionscited by 159
- 2013Stochastic Gradient Descent, Weighted Sampling, and the Randomized Kaczmarz algorithmcited by 133
- 2014Analysis and Design of Optimization Algorithms via Integral Quadratic Constraintscited by 105
- 2018SGD and Hogwild! Convergence Without the Bounded Gradients Assumptioncited by 95
- 2020SGD for Structured Nonconvex Functions: Learning Rates, Minibatching and Interpolationcited by 67
- 2018Stochastic (Approximate) Proximal Point Methods: Convergence, Optimality, and Adaptivitycited by 61
- 2013Fast Convergence of Stochastic Gradient Descent under a Strong Growth Conditioncited by 54
- 2024Clarabel: An interior-point solver for conic programs with quadratic objectivescited by 44
17 more
- 2015From error bounds to the complexity of first-order descent methods for convex functionscited by 43
- 2023A Guide Through the Zoo of Biased SGDcited by 40
- 2023Revisiting the Last-Iterate Convergence of Stochastic Gradient Methodscited by 38
- 2015Smooth Strongly Convex Interpolation and Exact Worst-case Performance of First-order Methodscited by 37
- 2018Stochastic Quasi-Gradient Methods: Variance Reduction via Jacobian Sketchingcited by 34
- 2021Stochastic Mirror Descent: Convergence Analysis and Adaptive Variants via the Mirror Stochastic Polyak Stepsizecited by 22
- 2025Towards Weaker Variance Assumptions for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 17
- 2019Stochastic first-order methods: non-asymptotic and computer-aided analyses via potential functionscited by 12
- 2016On the worst-case complexity of the gradient method with exact line search for smooth strongly convex functionscited by 9
- 2017Convergence of the Forward-Backward Algorithm: Beyond the Worst Case with the Help of Geometrycited by 7
- 2023Automated tight Lyapunov analysis for first-order methodscited by 6
- 2025Revisiting Stochastic Proximal Point Methods: Generalized Smoothness and Similaritycited by 6
- 2017Exact worst-case convergence rates of the proximal gradient method for composite convex minimizationcited by 5
- 2024A Unified Theory of Stochastic Proximal Point Methods without Smoothnesscited by 4
- 2024Exact worst-case convergence rates of gradient descent: a complete analysis for all constant stepsizes over nonconvex and convex functionscited by 4
- 2023Variance reduction techniques for stochastic proximal point algorithmscited by 3
- 2024Defining Lyapunov functions as the solution of a performance estimation saddle point problemcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.