mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

The Lovelace 2.0 Test of Artificial Creativity and Intelligence

arXiv 1410.6142 ↗First posted 22 Oct 2014cs.AIcited by 14

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Observing that the creation of certain types of artistic artifacts necessitate intelligence, we present the Lovelace 2.0 Test of creativity as an alternative to the Turing Test as a means of determining whether an agent is intelligent. The Lovelace 2.0 Test builds off prior tests of creativity and additionally provides a means of directly comparing the relative intelligence of different agents.

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 22 Oct 2014.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 5; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 4; 2026: 1.

14 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2021Creativity and Machine Learning: A Surveycited by 21
  2. 2022Creative Wand: A System to Study Effects of Communications in Co-Creative Settingscited by 9
  3. 2022Chatbots in a Botnet Worldcited by 8
  4. 2022The Turing Deceptioncited by 5
  5. 2025The Narrative Continuity Test: A Conceptual Framework for Evaluating Identity Persistence in AI Systemscited by 3
  6. 2021Towards A Measure Of General Machine Intelligencecited by 2
  7. 2023Can I say, now machines can think?cited by 2
  8. 2022The Meta-Turing Testcited by 1
  9. 2021An Objective Laboratory Protocol for Evaluating Cognition of Non-Human Systems Against Human Cognitioncited by 0
  10. 2022AI-HRI Brings New Dimensions to Human-Aware Design for Human-Aware AIcited by 0
  11. 2025Next Token Prediction Is a Dead End for Creativitycited by 0
  12. 2025React to This (RTT): A Nonverbal Turing Test for Embodied AIcited by 0
2 more
  1. 2025The next question after Turing's question: Introducing the Grow-AI testcited by 0
  2. 2026Agentic Cognitive Depth: Operational Criteria for Evaluating LLM Agentscited by 0