mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Computing Approximate Nash Equilibria in Polymatrix Games

arXiv 1409.3741 ↗First posted 12 Sep 2014cs.GTcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In an ε-Nash equilibrium, a player can gain at most ε by unilaterally changing his behaviour. For two-player (bimatrix) games with payoffs in [0,1], the best-knownε achievable in polynomial time is 0.3393. In general, for n-player games an ε-Nash equilibrium can be computed in polynomial time for an ε that is an increasing function of n but does not depend on the number of strategies of the players. For three-player and four-player games the corresponding values of ε are 0.6022 and 0.7153, respectively. Polymatrix games are a restriction of general n-player games where a player's payoff is the sum of payoffs from a number of bimatrix games. There exists a very small but constant ε such that computing an ε-Nash equilibrium of a polymatrix game is PPAD-hard. Our main result is that a (0.5+δ)-Nash equilibrium of an n-player polymatrix game can be computed in time polynomial in the input size and frac1δ. Inspired by the algorithm of Tsaknakis and Spirakis, our algorithm uses gradient descent on the maximum regret of the players. We also show that this algorithm can be applied to efficiently find a (0.5+δ)-Nash equilibrium in a two-player Bayesian game.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 12 Sep 2014.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 2.

5 papers.