Blowfish Privacy: Tuning Privacy-Utility Trade-offs using Policies
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Privacy definitions provide ways for trading-off the privacy of individuals in a statistical database for the utility of downstream analysis of the data. In this paper, we present Blowfish, a class of privacy definitions inspired by the Pufferfish framework, that provides a rich interface for this trade-off. In particular, we allow data publishers to extend differential privacy using a policy, which specifies (a) secrets, or information that must be kept secret, and (b) constraints that may be known about the data. While the secret specification allows increased utility by lessening protection for certain individual properties, the constraint specification provides added protection against an adversary who knows correlations in the data (arising from constraints). We formalize policies and present novel algorithms that can handle general specifications of sensitive information and certain count constraints. We show that there are reasonable policies under which our privacy mechanisms for k-means clustering, histograms and range queries introduce significantly lesser noise than their differentially private counterparts. We quantify the privacy-utility trade-offs for various policies analytically and empirically on real datasets.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 13 Dec 2013.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 3; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 3.
12 papers.
- 2022OpBoost: A Vertical Federated Tree Boosting Framework Based on Order-Preserving Desensitizationcited by 12
- 2022Algorithms with More Granular Differential Privacy Guaranteescited by 4
- 2025Tree-based Models for Vertical Federated Learning: A Surveycited by 3
- 2023R'enyi Pufferfish Privacy: General Additive Noise Mechanisms and Privacy Amplification by Iterationcited by 2
- 2024Enhancing Feature-Specific Data Protection via Bayesian Coordinate Differential Privacycited by 2
- 2021On Privacy and Confidentiality of Communications in Organizational Graphscited by 0
- 2021A Shuffling Framework for Local Differential Privacycited by 0
- 2022Rainbow Differential Privacycited by 0
- 2025Power Mechanism: Private Tabular Representation Release for Model Agnostic Consumptioncited by 0
- 2026Cross-Silo De-Anonymization Under Local Differential Privacy: Threat Model, Phase Transition, and Coordination Necessitycited by 0
- 2026Predictability as a Fine-Grained Measure for Privacycited by 0
- 2026Agents That Know Too Much: A Data-Centric Survey of Privacy in LLM Agentscited by 0
- 2026Agents That Know Too Much: A Data-Centric Survey of Privacy in LLM Agents25 Jun 2026
- 2026Predictability as a Fine-Grained Measure for Privacy18 Jun 2026
- 2026Cross-Silo De-Anonymization Under Local Differential Privacy: Threat Model, Phase Transition, and Coordination Necessity15 Jun 2026
- 2025Power Mechanism: Private Tabular Representation Release for Model Agnostic Consumption7 Oct 2025
- 2025Tree-based Models for Vertical Federated Learning: A Survey3 Apr 2025
- 2024Enhancing Feature-Specific Data Protection via Bayesian Coordinate Differential Privacy24 Oct 2024
- 2023R'enyi Pufferfish Privacy: General Additive Noise Mechanisms and Privacy Amplification by Iteration21 Dec 2023
- 2022OpBoost: A Vertical Federated Tree Boosting Framework Based on Order-Preserving Desensitization4 Oct 2022
- 2022Algorithms with More Granular Differential Privacy Guarantees8 Sep 2022
- 2022Rainbow Differential Privacy8 Feb 2022
- 2021A Shuffling Framework for Local Differential Privacy11 Jun 2021
- 2021On Privacy and Confidentiality of Communications in Organizational Graphs27 May 2021