mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

On Privacy and Confidentiality of Communications in Organizational Graphs

arXiv 2105.13418 ↗First posted 27 May 2021cs.CR cs.CL cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine learned models trained on organizational communication data, such as emails in an enterprise, carry unique risks of breaching confidentiality, even if the model is intended only for internal use. This work shows how confidentiality is distinct from privacy in an enterprise context, and aims to formulate an approach to preserving confidentiality while leveraging principles from differential privacy. The goal is to perform machine learning tasks, such as learning a language model or performing topic analysis, using interpersonal communications in the organization, while not learning about confidential information shared in the organization. Works that apply differential privacy techniques to natural language processing tasks usually assume independently distributed data, and overlook potential correlation among the records. Ignoring this correlation results in a fictional promise of privacy. Naively extending differential privacy techniques to focus on group privacy instead of record-level privacy is a straightforward approach to mitigate this issue. This approach, although providing a more realistic privacy-guarantee, is over-cautious and severely impacts model utility. We show this gap between these two extreme measures of privacy over two language tasks, and introduce a middle-ground solution. We propose a model that captures the correlation in the social network graph, and incorporates this correlation in the privacy calculations through Pufferfish privacy principles.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 May 2021.

Builds on

12 of 56 references.

References · 12

  1. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,728
  2. 2019Gmail Smart Compose: Real-Time Assisted Writingcited by 98
  3. 2019Practical Differentially Private Top-k Selection with Pay-what-you-get Compositioncited by 39
  4. 2018Privacy in Social Media: Identification, Mitigation and Applicationscited by 19
  5. 2017A Survey of Location Prediction on Twittercited by 17
  6. 2016Pufferfish Privacy Mechanisms for Correlated Datacited by 16
  7. 2020Differentially Private Set Unioncited by 14
  8. 2013Recursive Mechanism: Towards Node Differential Privacy and Unrestricted Joins [Full Version, Draft 0.1]cited by 13
  9. 2013Blowfish Privacy: Tuning Privacy-Utility Trade-offs using Policiescited by 12
  10. 2016Inferential Privacy Guarantees for Differentially Private Mechanismscited by 11
  11. 2015Efficient Lipschitz Extensions for High-Dimensional Graph Statistics and Node Private Degree Distributionscited by 8
  12. 2017walk2friends: Inferring Social Links from Mobility Profilescited by 7

Built on by

Not cited yet.