Rainbow Differential Privacy
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We extend a previous framework for designing differentially private (DP) mechanisms via randomized graph colorings that was restricted to binary functions, corresponding to colorings in a graph, to multi-valued functions. As before, datasets are nodes in the graph and any two neighboring datasets are connected by an edge. In our setting, we assume that each dataset has a preferential ordering for the possible outputs of the mechanism, each of which we refer to as a rainbow. Different rainbows partition the graph of datasets into different regions. We show that if the DP mechanism is pre-specified at the boundary of such regions and behaves identically for all same-rainbow boundary datasets, at most one optimal such mechanism can exist and the problem can be solved by means of a morphism to a line graph. We then show closed form expressions for the line graph in the case of ternary functions. Treatment of ternary queries in this paper displays enough richness to be extended to higher-dimensional query spaces with preferential query ordering, but the optimality proof does not seem to follow directly from the ternary proof.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Feb 2022.
Builds on
6 of 15 references.
References · 6
- 2014RAPPOR: Randomized Aggregatable Privacy-Preserving Ordinal Responsecited by 262
- 2017Collecting Telemetry Data Privatelycited by 147
- 2013Blowfish Privacy: Tuning Privacy-Utility Trade-offs using Policiescited by 12
- 2016Individual Differential Privacy: A Utility-Preserving Formulation of Differential Privacy Guaranteescited by 10
- 2019Profile-Based Privacy for Locally Private Computationscited by 5
- 2016Optimal Differentially Private Mechanisms for Randomised Responsecited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.