mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Privately Publishable Per-instance Privacy

arXiv 2111.02281 ↗First posted 3 Nov 2021cs.CR cs.LG stat.MLcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We consider how to privately share the personalized privacy losses incurred by objective perturbation, using per-instance differential privacy (pDP). Standard differential privacy (DP) gives us a worst-case bound that might be orders of magnitude larger than the privacy loss to a particular individual relative to a fixed dataset. The pDP framework provides a more fine-grained analysis of the privacy guarantee to a target individual, but the per-instance privacy loss itself might be a function of sensitive data. In this paper, we analyze the per-instance privacy loss of releasing a private empirical risk minimizer learned via objective perturbation, and propose a group of methods to privately and accurately publish the pDP losses at little to no additional privacy cost.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Nov 2021.

Builds on

8 of 28 references.

References · 8

  1. 2018Scalable Private Learning with PATEcited by 269
  2. 2018Improving the Gaussian Mechanism for Differential Privacy: Analytical Calibration and Optimal Denoisingcited by 218
  3. 2021Large Scale Private Learning via Low-rank Reparametrizationcited by 88
  4. 2020Individual Privacy Accounting via a Renyi Filtercited by 59
  5. 2017Privacy Loss in Apple's Implementation of Differential Privacy on MacOS 10.12cited by 43
  6. 2013Private Matchings and Allocationscited by 23
  7. 2015Fast Differentially Private Matrix Factorizationcited by 20
  8. 2017Accuracy First: Selecting a Differential Privacy Level for Accuracy-Constrained ERMcited by 20

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 4; 2023: 3; 2024: 3; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

12 papers.