mlsanityData to 19 Oct 2026

SNOAR: Self-training with Noise filtering, Observation adding, and Remixing for Speech Denoising Without Clean References

arXiv 2610.20863 ↗First posted 14 Oct 2026eess.AS cs.LG cs.SDcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Unsupervised speech denoising methods such as MixIT and noisy-target training can be trained directly on noisy recordings, avoiding the sim-to-real gap of synthetic training data, but remain well below supervised performance. Teacher--student self-training, as in RemixIT, narrows this gap by remixing a teacher's estimates into new mixtures that supervise a student; however, since the student is trained only toward the teacher's estimates, teacher errors, in particular over-suppressed speech, are never recovered and propagate as the teacher is updated from the student. We propose SNOAR, a self-training framework that corrects the teacher's estimates before use: the noise leaked into its speech estimate is removed by differential noise filtering (DNF), and part of the noisy observation is added back in to restore suppressed speech and attenuate artifacts. We show that the two corrections depend on each other, as without DNF the loop collapses to the identity mapping. Compared to RemixIT, SNOAR is more stable along training and outperforms it in signal-based, perceptual, and word error rate metrics, reaching 97% of the SI-SDR improvement of a fully-supervised topline on WHAM!; on real CHiME-3 recordings, it improves every metric of three different teachers, while RemixIT degrades their perceptual quality.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 19 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Oct 2026.

Builds on

20 of 29 references.

References · 20

  1. 2018SDR - half-baked or well done?cited by 626
  2. 2022UTMOS: UTokyo-SaruLab System for VoiceMOS Challenge 2022cited by 552
  3. 2019Pseudo-Labeling and Confirmation Bias in Deep Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 515
  4. 2020DNSMOS: A Non-Intrusive Perceptual Objective Speech Quality metric to evaluate Noise Suppressorscited by 356
  5. 2019WHAM!: Extending Speech Separation to Noisy Environmentscited by 246
  6. 2022TF-GridNet: Integrating Full- and Sub-Band Modeling for Speech Separationcited by 121
  7. 2022Self-Training: A Surveycited by 89
  8. 2022How Bad Are Artifacts?: Analyzing the Impact of Speech Enhancement Errors on ASRcited by 63
  9. 2018Differentiable Consistency Constraints for Improved Deep Speech Enhancementcited by 53
  10. 2024VERSA: A Versatile Evaluation Toolkit for Speech, Audio, and Musiccited by 44
  11. 2017Statistical Speech Enhancement Based on Probabilistic Integration of Variational Autoencoder and Non-Negative Matrix Factorizationcited by 42
  12. 2022RemixIT: Continual self-training of speech enhancement models via bootstrapped remixingcited by 41
8 more
  1. 2025OWSM v4: Improving Open Whisper-Style Speech Models via Data Scaling and Cleaningcited by 39
  2. 2021Noisy-target Training: A Training Strategy for DNN-based Speech Enhancement without Clean Speechcited by 27
  3. 2023The CHiME-7 UDASE task: Unsupervised domain adaptation for conversational speech enhancementcited by 18
  4. 2023Unsupervised speech enhancement with diffusion-based generative modelscited by 17
  5. 2021Continual self-training with bootstrapped remixing for speech enhancementcited by 9
  6. 2022Analysis of Noisy-target Training for DNN-based speech enhancementcited by 7
  7. 2024Objective and subjective evaluation of speech enhancement methods in the UDASE task of the 7th CHiME challengecited by 5
  8. 2026Exploiting Noise Inseparability for Weakly-Supervised Discriminative Speech Denoising Using Noisy Targetscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.