mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Probing Negation Understanding in Vision-Language Models With Object Attention

arXiv 2610.20852 ↗First posted 14 Oct 2026cs.CV cs.AI cs.CLcited by 0

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

Negation is a fundamental aspect of language understanding and it is important vision-language models (VLMs) are able to process it effectively. We investigate how VLMs process negation by analysing attention patterns of different models. We draw comparisons between human gaze and attention in models when processing affirmative vs negated statements. We compare object level model attention to human eye-fixations in both binary and multary settings, evaluating with both synthetic and realistic datasets. We find models generally do not follow human-like attention patterns when resolving negation, suggesting they rely on mechanisms outside of attention. While layerwise analysis shows that PaliGemma2-3B shifts object attention to the alternative under negation, our headwise ablations suggest this is a byproduct rather than a negation processing mechanism. Additionally, we find that LLaVA-1.5-7B displays a spatial bias towards left-side objects. Our evaluation of models on downstream tasks shows that all models have a discrepancy between affirmative and negated questions highlighting the need to better understand the underlying processing of negation to close this performance gap. Code available at https://github.com/otmive/negation_attention

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. First posted on arXiv 14 Oct 2026.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Vision-Language Models Do Not Understand Negation
  2. 2025NegVQA: Can Vision Language Models Understand Negation?
  3. 2025Investigating The Functional Roles of Attention Heads in Vision Language Models: Evidence for Reasoning Modules
  4. 2026Visual Attention Faithfulness in Vision-Language Models is Heterogeneous
  5. 2026Skeleton-and-Strategy Prompting: Training-Free Negation Understanding for Vision-Language Models
  6. 2025Can Vision-Language Models Count? A Synthetic Benchmark and Analysis of Attention-Based Interventions
  7. 2026When Negation Is a Geometry Problem in Vision-Language Models
  8. 2026Diagnosing Visual Ignorance in Vision-Language Models