Decoupled Marginal Sharpening for Training-Free Inference-Time Scaling
On the map: LLM reasoning → Test-time compute and efficient thinking
Abstract (arXiv)
We study how to improve LLM reasoning at inference time without updating model weights or using external reward models. Recent reward-free power-sampling methods define the sequence-level power target πα(ymid x)propto p0(ymid x)α, where α>1, which increases the relative probability of completions that are already likely under the base model. Existing methods use Metropolis--Hastings or Sequential Monte Carlo (SMC) to approximately sample from this target. However, two challenges arise at different levels. At the target level, full-sequence sharpening can concentrate probability on a few exact reasoning--answer trajectories, suppressing alternative paths that support the same answer. At the sampler level, finite-particle SMC can suffer from path collapse when resampling repeatedly duplicates a few high-weight prefixes. To address these challenges, we propose Decoupled Marginal Sharpening (DMS), which separately controls how strongly the model favors particular reasoning paths and how strongly it favors final answers after aggregating support across those paths. At the target level, DMS first samples from a sharpened reasoning distribution, then marginalizes the model's answer probabilities over the resulting weighted reasoning population and sharpens the induced answer marginal. Separate exponents allow mild reasoning sharpening to encourage exploration of diverse paths, followed by stronger answer-marginal sharpening to concentrate probability on answers with greater aggregate support across those paths. At the sampler level, we develop Fully Adapted Annealed SMC, which combines an annealed sequence of power targets with locally fully adapted proposals and predictive ancestor resampling. Experiments on MATH500, GPQA-Diamond, HumanEval, and AIME24/25 across three base models show that DMS achieves the highest mean pass@1 among the compared methods in all tasks.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 26 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Oct 2026.
Builds on
26 of 30 references.
Closest ancestors · 6
Same direction, newest first
- 2026Self-Consistency via Marginal Sharpening27 May
- 2026Power-SMC: Low-Latency Sequence-Level Power Sampling for Training-Free LLM Reasoning10 Feb
- 2026On the Power of (Approximate) Reward Models for Inference-Time Scaling1 Feb
- 2024Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameters6 Aug
- 2023Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Models17 May
- 2022STaR: Bootstrapping Reasoning With Reasoning28 Mar
Other references · 20
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
- 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,320
- 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,708
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
- 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,789
- 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,879
- 2023Distilling Step-by-Step! Outperforming Larger Language Models with Less Training Data and Smaller Model Sizescited by 737
- 2024Self-Improvement in Language Models: The Sharpening Mechanismcited by 104
- 2024Probabilistic Inference in Language Models via Twisted Sequential Monte Carlocited by 90
- 2025Reasoning with Sampling: Your Base Model is Smarter Than You Thinkcited by 89
8 more
- 2026Embarrassingly Simple Self-Distillation Improves Code Generationcited by 40
- 2026Scalable Power Sampling: Unlocking Efficient, Training-Free Reasoning for LLMs via Distribution Sharpeningcited by 31
- 2024Step-by-Step Reasoning for Math Problems via Twisted Sequential Monte Carlocited by 22
- 2026The Model Knows, the Decoder Finds: Future Value Guided Particle Power Samplingcited by 6
- 2026Inference-Time Alignment of Diffusion Models via Trust-Region Iterative Twisted Sequential Monte Carlocited by 6
- 2026Sampling for Quality: Training-Free Reward-Guided LLM Decoding via Sequential Monte Carlocited by 5
- 2026When are likely answers right? On Sequence Probability and Correctness in LLMscited by 4
- 2026Ensembling Language Models with Sequential Monte Carlocited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Explore Broadly, Reason Sharply: Push Small Models toward the Frontier via Sampling
- 2026A Critical Look at Power Sampling when Test Time Sharpening LLMs
- 2026Refining Over Resampling: Test-Time Self-Correction for LLM Reasoning
- 2026Chopthin-Consensus Power Sampling: A Diversity-Preserving Approach to LLM Decoding
- 2026Adaptive Power Sampling for LLM Reasoning
- 2025Fixing the Broken Compass: Diagnosing and Improving Inference-Time Reward Modeling
- 2026Sampling via Decision-Flow: Training-Free Extraction of Improved Latent Reasoning Paths in Large Language Models
- 2025CarBoN: Calibrated Best-of-N Sampling Improves Test-time Reasoning