mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Evaluating Agentic Capabilities Before Post-Training: An End-to-End Approach

arXiv 2610.19425 ↗First posted 14 Oct 2026cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent skill learning and evolution also fits: General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks

Abstract (arXiv)

Agentic capabilities are increasingly important for modern LLMs, yet remain difficult to evaluate during pretraining. Existing approaches typically rely on static trajectory-derived tasks or likelihood-based proxies, which are lightweight but provide limited visibility into how base models behave in interactive environments. We introduce ASAP (Agent Scaffold Adaptation for Pretraining Evaluation), a lightweight framework for eliciting and evaluating agentic behavior from pretrained base models on end-to-end tasks. Rather than converting base models into chat-style agents, ASAP preserves the completion interface and adapts existing agent scaffolds through structured trajectory continuation, short reference prefixes, and minimal recovery mechanisms. Across software-engineering and deep-research benchmarks, ASAP yields discriminative end-to-end performance across base models and pretraining checkpoints. Beyond aggregate scores, ASAP exposes model-generated execution trajectories, enabling analysis of exploration, editing, testing, recovery, and task completion across training stages. These trajectories provide a behavioral view of how agent-relevant capabilities change during pretraining and how execution patterns differ after post-training. Our results suggest that end-to-end agent evaluation can complement conventional pretraining benchmarks by providing a practical diagnostic of interactive model behavior.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent skill learning and evolution, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 12 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Oct 2026.

Builds on

12 of 15 references.

References · 12

  1. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
  2. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,320
  3. 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,373
  4. 2024SWE-agent: Agent-Computer Interfaces Enable Automated Software Engineeringcited by 1,737
  5. 2024OpenHands: An Open Platform for AI Software Developers as Generalist Agentscited by 1,002
  6. 2026GLM-5: from Vibe Coding to Agentic Engineeringcited by 587
  7. 2026Terminal-Bench: Benchmarking Agents on Hard, Realistic Tasks in Command Line Interfacescited by 585
  8. 2025GLM-4.5: Agentic, Reasoning, and Coding (ARC) Foundation Modelscited by 467
  9. 2025BrowseComp-Plus: A More Fair and Transparent Evaluation Benchmark of Deep-Research Agentcited by 200
  10. 2026DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: Pushing the Limits of KV Cache Compressioncited by 76
  11. 2026The MiniMax-M2 Series: Mini Activations Unleashing Max Real-World Intelligencecited by 61
  12. 2025APTBench: Benchmarking Agentic Potential of Base LLMs During Pre-Trainingcited by 11

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026EvoAgentBench: Benchmarking Agent Self-Evolution via Ability Transfer
  2. 2026TrajLong: Co-Designing Agentic and Long-Context Supervision for Mid-Training
  3. 2026A Framework for Evaluating Agentic Skills at Scale
  4. 2026SkillAudit: Ground-Truth-Free Skill Evolution via Paired Trajectory Auditing
  5. 2026SkillFocus: Evolving Agent Skills via Capability Decomposition
  6. 2026Demystifying Agent Skills: Why They Work-Until They Don't
  7. 2026SkillAdaptor: Self-Adapting Skills for LLM Agents from Trajectories
  8. 2026SkillCoach: Self-Evolving Rubrics for Evaluating and Enhancing Agentic Skill-Use