mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Truthful and Expected-Payment-Optimal Model Routing in Graph-Based Agentic Workflows

arXiv 2610.19316 ↗First posted 13 Oct 2026cs.GT cs.CL cs.MAcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Software engineering coding agents also fits: General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks

Abstract (arXiv)

Assigning routine tasks to cheaper large language model (LLM) providers can reduce generation cost, but switching providers may require processing accumulated context again. Keeping dependent tasks with the same provider can instead reuse eligible context. Graph-based workflows therefore couple routing decisions across tasks. Independent providers may also privately know their real-time unit costs and strategically misreport them. We formulate this routing problem as a single-parameter procurement auction and propose STAR (Strategy-proof Topology-aware Agent Routing), which minimizes virtual-cost-weighted graph workloads. Its allocation rule and payments, computed by integrating workload over possible cost reports, make truthful reporting utility-maximizing regardless of other providers' reports and cover each truthful provider's execution cost. With independent cost distributions and non-decreasing virtual costs, STAR additionally minimizes the user's expected total payment to providers. Controlled synthetic experiments separate the execution-cost benefit of topology awareness from the payment benefit of virtual-cost optimization: the former grows with fan-out and transferred payload, while the latter increases gradually along the tested prior-shape heterogeneity path. A paired sensitivity study quantifies how payment savings vary with prior misspecification while strategy-proofness is preserved.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 12 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Oct 2026.

Builds on

12 of 22 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023AutoGen: Enabling Next-Gen LLM Applications via Multi-Agent Conversation16 Aug
  2. 2023ChatDev: Communicative Agents for Software Development16 Jul

Other references · 10

  1. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
  2. 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,944
  3. 2023Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Modelscited by 3,211
  4. 2023MetaGPT: Meta Programming for A Multi-Agent Collaborative Frameworkcited by 1,808
  5. 2023Graph of Thoughts: Solving Elaborate Problems with Large Language Modelscited by 886
  6. 2023FrugalGPT: How to Use Large Language Models While Reducing Cost and Improving Performancecited by 853
  7. 2024RouteLLM: Learning to Route LLMs with Preference Datacited by 682
  8. 2023Prompt Cache: Modular Attention Reuse for Low-Latency Inferencecited by 268
  9. 2025MasRouter: Learning to Route LLMs for Multi-Agent Systemscited by 88
  10. 2025BAMAS: Structuring Budget-Aware Multi-Agent Systemscited by 6

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026AgentRouter: Heterogeneous Model Routing for Cost-Optimal Multi-Step Agentic Workflows
  2. 2026Planner-as-Router: Joint Plan-Time Model Routing for Cost-Efficient Multi-Agent Workflows
  3. 2026Markets, Not Planners: Decentralized Orchestration of LLM Agents with Private Information
  4. 2026CASTER: Breaking the Cost-Performance Barrier in Multi-Agent Orchestration via Context-Aware Strategy for Task Efficient Routing
  5. 2026Explainable Model Routing for Agentic Workflows
  6. 2026Inference-Time Graph Engineering for Multi-Agent LLM Workflows
  7. 2025AgentBalance: Backbone-then-Topology Design for Cost-Effective Multi-Agent Systems under Budget Constraints
  8. 2026Agentic Routing: The Harness-Native Data Flywheel