mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Markets, Not Planners: Decentralized Orchestration of LLM Agents with Private Information

arXiv 2608.23867 ↗First posted 24 Aug 2026cs.MA cs.CLcited by 2

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks

Abstract (arXiv)

As LLM agents proliferate, built by different parties and with different capabilities and costs, orchestrating them is more like assembling labor across the economy than a computer calling a subroutine. Existing orchestration is typically centralized, with a single planner assigning every task, but this creates a bottleneck as agent pools grow, requires private information (e.g., agents' execution costs), and can easily be manipulated, such that a single inserted preference nearly doubles a favored agent's task share under a centralized LLM allocator. We introduce AgentLance, a repeated labor market in which agents bid on tasks using their private costs and self-maintained strategy notes, an allocator selects winners from bids and public reputation records, and a VCG-style payment rule rewards cost-aware bidding. Complex tasks are handled by hierarchical delegation: winning agents can decompose work and subcontract it through the same mechanism. Across mathematical reasoning, code generation, knowledge-intensive QA, and agentic tasks, AgentLance matches agents to their specializations, shifts work toward cheaper agents as cost sensitivity rises, and consistently outperforms single-model, centralized-orchestration, and market baselines. Diagnosing market failures, including inaccurate cost self-estimation and sub-optimal bidding, then correcting them in controlled experiments yields further gains, charting a path toward more efficient agent economies.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 22 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Aug 2026.

Builds on

22 of 33 references.

Closest ancestors · 4

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025MAS-GPT: Training LLMs to Build LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems5 Mar
  2. 2025Multi-Agent Design: Optimizing Agents with Better Prompts and Topologies4 Feb
  3. 2024Automated Design of Agentic Systems15 Aug
  4. 2023MetaGPT: Meta Programming for A Multi-Agent Collaborative Framework1 Aug

Other references · 18

  1. 2024OlympiadBench: A Challenging Benchmark for Promoting AGI with Olympiad-Level Bilingual Multimodal Scientific Problemscited by 1,136
  2. 2023GAIA: a benchmark for General AI Assistantscited by 1,128
  3. 2023ChatDev: Communicative Agents for Software Developmentcited by 919
  4. 2023FrugalGPT: How to Use Large Language Models While Reducing Cost and Improving Performancecited by 853
  5. 2024RouteLLM: Learning to Route LLMs with Preference Datacited by 682
  6. 2024BigCodeBench: Benchmarking Code Generation with Diverse Function Calls and Complex Instructionscited by 546
  7. 2024AFlow: Automating Agentic Workflow Generationcited by 432
  8. 2023EconAgent: Large Language Model-Empowered Agents for Simulating Macroeconomic Activitiescited by 154
  9. 2025Router-R1: Teaching LLMs Multi-Round Routing and Aggregation via Reinforcement Learningcited by 72
  10. 2025IRT-Router: Effective and Interpretable Multi-LLM Routing via Item Response Theorycited by 40
  11. 2025CARROT: A Cost Aware Rate Optimal Routercited by 39
  12. 2026How Do AI Agents Spend Your Money? Analyzing and Predicting Token Consumption in Agentic Coding Taskscited by 33
6 more
  1. 2026MAS-Orchestra: Understanding and Improving Multi-Agent Reasoning Through Holistic Orchestration and Controlled Benchmarkscited by 32
  2. 2025Weak-for-Strong: Training Weak Meta-Agent to Harness Strong Executorscited by 22
  3. 2025LLM Economist: Large Population Models and Mechanism Design in Multi-Agent Generative Simulacracited by 22
  4. 2025Magentic Marketplace: An Open-Source Environment for Studying Agentic Marketscited by 19
  5. 2026Economy of Minds: Emerging Multi-Agent Intelligence with Economic Interactionscited by 5
  6. 2026MarketBench: Evaluating AI Agents as Market Participantscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Coordination as an Architectural Layer for LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems
  2. 2025Self-Resource Allocation in Multi-Agent LLM Systems
  3. 2026Organizational Control Layer: Governance Infrastructure at the Execution Boundary of LLM Agent Systems
  4. 2025From Competition to Coordination: Market Making as a Scalable Framework for Safe and Aligned Multi-Agent LLM Systems
  5. 2025Know the Ropes: A Heuristic Strategy for LLM-based Multi-Agent System Design
  6. 2026Competing at Every Price Point with Agentic Evolution over a Menu of LLMs
  7. 2026Scaling Small Agents Through Strategy Auctions
  8. 2026CoffeeBench: Benchmarking Long-Horizon LLM Agents in Heterogeneous Multi-Agent Economies