MIND: Instruction-Conditioned Incremental Grounding for Robots
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Robots following persistent language instructions must decide which cached room judgments remain valid as their environment changes. We present MIND (Maintenance via INstruction-conditioned Dependencies), a framework for maintaining target-room decisions without re-evaluating every room after each event. A language model compiles each instruction into dependencies for semantic qualification and target selection. The controller intersects semantic dependencies with event footprints, refreshes affected judgments, and updates reachability and selection separately. For fixed deterministic evaluation, planning, and selection, conservative dependency and footprint coverage preserves the decisions of full recomputation. On 240 five-event ProcTHOR sequences with an exact benchmark predicate, MIND reduces mean semantic evaluations from 30.6 to 11.2 while preserving all 1,200 post-event decisions. Frozen-evaluator experiments with Phi-4 and Qwen3-14B also preserve all 1,200 decisions, without improving the evaluators' underlying task accuracy. In 32 closed-loop AI2-THOR episodes using exact-predicate qualification and metadata-derived footprints, MIND matches the final target decision of full recomputation in every episode. Unitree G1 experiments demonstrate target reuse and reselection across room transitions without additional semantic evaluations under MIND, and abstention after a barrier and an object removal at 4 evaluations against 15 to 18. Additional materials are available at https://mind-icra27.github.io/.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Oct 2026.
Builds on
24 of 30 references.
References · 24
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
- 2022Do As I Can, Not As I Say: Grounding Language in Robotic Affordancescited by 2,348
- 2022Inner Monologue: Embodied Reasoning through Planning with Language Modelscited by 1,081
- 2017AI2-THOR: An Interactive 3D Environment for Visual AIcited by 869
- 2022ProcTHOR: Large-Scale Embodied AI Using Procedural Generationcited by 380
- 2023Scaling Open-Vocabulary Object Detectioncited by 343
- 2023Robots That Ask For Help: Uncertainty Alignment for Large Language Model Plannerscited by 308
- 2023SayPlan: Grounding Large Language Models using 3D Scene Graphs for Scalable Robot Task Planningcited by 294
- 2023Text2Motion: From Natural Language Instructions to Feasible Planscited by 224
- 2023Grounded Decoding: Guiding Text Generation with Grounded Models for Embodied Agentscited by 67
- 2023CLARA: Classifying and Disambiguating User Commands for Reliable Interactive Robotic Agentscited by 30
- 2024LiP-LLM: Integrating Linear Programming and dependency graph with Large Language Models for multi-robot task planningcited by 24
12 more
- 2024DART-LLM: Dependency-Aware Multi-Robot Task Decomposition and Execution using Large Language Modelscited by 19
- 2020DeComplex: Task planning from complex natural instructions by a collocating robotcited by 11
- 2024LINGO-Space: Language-Conditioned Incremental Grounding for Spacecited by 8
- 2025STMA: A Spatio-Temporal Memory Agent for Long-Horizon Embodied Task Planningcited by 6
- 2026KEEP: A KV-Cache-Centric Memory Management System for Efficient Embodied Planningcited by 5
- 2023DynaCon: Dynamic Robot Planner with Contextual Awareness via LLMscited by 4
- 2026AgenticCache: Cache-Driven Asynchronous Planning for Embodied AI Agentscited by 4
- 2025Context Matters! Relaxing Goals with LLMs for Feasible 3D Scene Planningcited by 3
- 2025Event-Grounding Graph: Unified Spatio-Temporal Scene Graph from Robotic Observationscited by 2
- 2026Integrated Exploration and Sequential Manipulation on Scene Graph with LLM-based Situated Replanningcited by 2
- 2026When Memory Lies: An Empirical Study of Spatial Memory Staleness in VLM Agentscited by 2
- 2026Mimir: A Neuro-Symbolic Memory System with Dynamic Grounding for Embodied Agents in Interactive Environmentscited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.