Euclidean Distance-Based Flow Matching
On the map: Diffusion models → Flow matching, time series and science
Abstract (arXiv)
Flow Matching has recently become popular as a technique for generative modeling with applications in many domains. In the standard Flow Matching formulation, we interpret the vector field as the solution of a least-squares regression problem, which is known to be sensitive to contamination. Therefore we leverage the viewpoint of robust statistics and replace the squared Euclidean distance with the Euclidean distance as a regression objective. This seemingly minor change strongly affects the properties of Flow Matching. We provide a probabilistic interpretation of the new regression target as a conditional geometric median and use this characterization to study distributional robustness of the Euclidean Distance-based Flow Matching. We analyze the mathematical properties of this changed objective and the effect of a contaminated target distribution on the involved conditional velocity distributions. We discuss the challenge of directly characterizing the distribution that our method induces. In specific contamination settings we show theoretically that our method yields an improvement for severe contamination. Finally, we present numerical experiments conducted on the CIFAR-10 image dataset where a proportion of the samples has been contaminated. Our Euclidean distance-based Flow Matching shows a clear advantage in scenarios of severe contamination of the target distribution.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Flow matching, time series and science, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models. Builds on 13 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Oct 2026.
Builds on
13 of 27 references.
Closest ancestors · 4
Same direction, newest first
- 2023Multisample Flow Matching: Straightening Flows with Minibatch Couplings28 Apr
- 2023Improving and generalizing flow-based generative models with minibatch optimal transport1 Feb
- 2022Flow Matching for Generative Modeling6 Oct
- 2022Flow Straight and Fast: Learning to Generate and Transfer Data with Rectified Flow7 Sep
Other references · 9
- 2018Neural Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 3,779
- 2022Building Normalizing Flows with Stochastic Interpolantscited by 995
- 2023Stochastic Interpolants: A Unifying Framework for Flows and Diffusionscited by 939
- 2023Simulation-free Schr"odinger bridges via score and flow matchingcited by 83
- 2025Optimal and Diffusion Transports in Machine Learningcited by 6
- 2024Improving Diffusion Models's Data-Corruption Resistance using Scheduled Pseudo-Huber Losscited by 4
- 2025Robust Score Matchingcited by 2
- 2025L1 Sample Flow for Efficient Visuomotor Learningcited by 2
- 2026Robust Diffusion Models via Divergence-Induced Weighted Denoisingcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Score-Regularized Joint Sampling with Importance Weights for Flow Matching
- 2025Is There a Better Source Distribution than Gaussian? Exploring Source Distributions for Image Flow Matching
- 2026Flow Matching is Adaptive to Manifold Structures
- 2026Flow Matching under Noisy Latent Structure: Beyond Exact Low-Dimensional Support
- 2026Noise-Robust Conditional Flow Matching: Generating Clean Samples from Noisy Datasets
- 2026Flow Mismatching: Unsupervised Anomaly Detection via Velocity Discrepancies in Flow Matching Models
- 2026Mean Flow Distillation: Robust and Stable Distillation for Flow Matching Models
- 2026Posterior Augmented Flow Matching