Counterfactual Certification for Sequential Unlearning with Long-Run Performance Guarantees
On the map: LLM safety and security → Machine unlearning
Abstract (arXiv)
Certified machine unlearning ensures the proximity between the unlearned model and a model retrained without the data to be forgotten. Extending this framework to sequential deletion requests, typically arriving as groups of variable size (e.g., all records of one user or of coordinated users), is challenging. For unlearning methods based on fine-tuning on the retain sets, this leads to either degrading performance or increasing computation as the number of unlearning requests grows. For independent successive requests, we instead certify each model release against a counterfactual unlearning trajectory in which the group being deleted never took part. With a fixed fine-tuning budget per deletion, we show that, for smooth strongly convex objectives, this approach keeps the performance loss bounded, uniformly in the number of requests. Experiments with multiclass logistic regression on FEMNIST show that the resulting algorithm needs fewer corrective steps than existing sequential methods and outperforms training-time differential privacy, particularly when group sizes are heterogeneous.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Machine unlearning, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 20 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Oct 2026.
Builds on
20 of 28 references.
Closest ancestors · 9
Same direction, newest first
- 2026Protecting the Undeleted in Machine Unlearning18 Feb
- 2025Position: Bridge the Gaps between Machine Unlearning and AI Regulation18 Feb
- 2024Rewind-to-Delete: Certified Machine Unlearning for Nonconvex Functions15 Sep
- 2024Towards Certified Unlearning for Deep Neural Networks1 Aug
- 2024Hessian-Free Online Certified Unlearning2 Apr
- 2024Langevin Unlearning: A New Perspective of Noisy Gradient Descent for Machine Unlearning18 Jan
- 2022Forget Unlearning: Towards True Data-Deletion in Machine Learning17 Oct
- 2021Adaptive Machine Unlearning8 Jun
- 2021Remember What You Want to Forget: Algorithms for Machine Unlearning4 Mar
Other references · 11
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2018LEAF: A Benchmark for Federated Settingscited by 792
- 2019Certified Data Removal from Machine Learning Modelscited by 535
- 2019Making AI Forget You: Data Deletion in Machine Learningcited by 465
- 2020Descent-to-Delete: Gradient-Based Methods for Machine Unlearningcited by 311
- 2018Privacy Amplification by Iterationcited by 100
- 2021Differential Privacy Dynamics of Langevin Diffusion and Noisy Gradient Descentcited by 73
- 2022Privacy of Noisy Stochastic Gradient Descent: More Iterations without More Privacy Losscited by 61
- 2020Formalizing Data Deletion in the Context of the Right to be Forgottencited by 50
- 2022Differentially Private Learning Needs Hidden State (Or Much Faster Convergence)cited by 48
- 2024Shifted Interpolation for Differential Privacycited by 13
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Certified Unlearning for Neural Networks
- 2024The Utility and Complexity of in- and out-of-Distribution Machine Unlearning
- 2025Beyond Uniform Deletion: A Data Value-Weighted Framework for Certified Machine Unlearning
- 2025Efficient Verified Machine Unlearning For Distillation
- 2025Efficient Machine Unlearning by Model Splitting and Core Sample Selection
- 2025When to Forget? Complexity Trade-offs in Machine Unlearning
- 2026Unlearning with Asymmetric Sources: Improved Unlearning-Utility Trade-off with Public Data
- 2025A Certified Unlearning Approach without Access to Source Data