mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

When to Forget? Complexity Trade-offs in Machine Unlearning

arXiv 2502.17323 ↗First posted 24 Feb 2025stat.ML cs.LG math.OCcited by 9

On the map: LLM safety and security → Machine unlearning

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine Unlearning (MU) aims at removing the influence of specific data points from a trained model, striving to achieve this at a fraction of the cost of full model retraining. In this paper, we analyze the efficiency of unlearning methods and establish the first upper and lower bounds on minimax computation times for this problem, characterizing the performance of the most efficient algorithm against the most difficult objective function. Specifically, for strongly convex objective functions and under the assumption that the forget data is inaccessible to the unlearning method, we provide a phase diagram for the unlearning complexity ratio -- a novel metric that compares the computational cost of the best unlearning method to full model retraining. The phase diagram reveals three distinct regimes: one where unlearning at a reduced cost is infeasible, another where unlearning is trivial because adding noise suffices, and a third where unlearning achieves significant computational advantages over retraining. These findings highlight the critical role of factors such as data dimensionality, the number of samples to forget, and privacy constraints in determining the practical feasibility of unlearning.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Machine unlearning, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 27 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Feb 2025.

Builds on

27 of 42 references.

Closest ancestors · 12

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024The Utility and Complexity of in- and out-of-Distribution Machine Unlearning12 Dec
  2. 2024Attribute-to-Delete: Machine Unlearning via Datamodel Matching30 Oct
  3. 2024Inexact Unlearning Needs More Careful Evaluations to Avoid a False Sense of Privacy2 Mar
  4. 2024Eight Methods to Evaluate Robust Unlearning in LLMs26 Feb
  5. 2023Who's Harry Potter? Approximate Unlearning in LLMs3 Oct
  6. 2023Tight Bounds for Machine Unlearning via Differential Privacy2 Sep
  7. 2023From Adaptive Query Release to Machine Unlearning20 Jul
  8. 2023Towards Unbounded Machine Unlearning20 Feb
  9. 2022Forget Unlearning: Towards True Data-Deletion in Machine Learning17 Oct
  10. 2021Adaptive Machine Unlearning8 Jun
  11. 2021Remember What You Want to Forget: Algorithms for Machine Unlearning4 Mar
  12. 2021Machine Unlearning via Algorithmic Stability25 Feb

Other references · 15

  1. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
  2. 2019Machine Unlearningcited by 1,020
  3. 2019Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Net: Selective Forgetting in Deep Networkscited by 599
  4. 2014Convex Optimization: Algorithms and Complexitycited by 569
  5. 2019Certified Data Removal from Machine Learning Modelscited by 512
  6. 2019Making AI Forget You: Data Deletion in Machine Learningcited by 447
  7. 2020Descent-to-Delete: Gradient-Based Methods for Machine Unlearningcited by 303
  8. 2020Approximate Data Deletion from Machine Learning Modelscited by 250
  9. 2023Handbook of Convergence Theorems for (Stochastic) Gradient Methodscited by 158
  10. 2024The rising costs of training frontier AI modelscited by 91
  11. 2024The opportunities and risks of large language models in mental healthcited by 54
  12. 2022Data Redaction from Pre-trained GANscited by 18
3 more
  1. 2019Dataset Growth in Medical Image Analysis Researchcited by 16
  2. 2022SIFU: Sequential Informed Federated Unlearning for Efficient and Provable Client Unlearning in Federated Optimizationcited by 16
  3. 2024Privacy Policies and Consent Management Platforms: Growth and Users' Interactions over Timecited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 6.

9 papers.