mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Assessing the Performance of AI Models in Misinformation Detection Using Predefined Social Noise Constructs

arXiv 2610.17469 ↗First posted 12 Oct 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Social media platforms generate vast volumes of user-generated content that often obscure meaningful discourse, a phenomenon conceptualized as social noise. While existing misinformation detection methods primarily focus on factual verification, they largely overlook the role of social noise in amplifying misinformation. This study assesses the performance of six text-based models and a graph neural network (GNN) in mitigating the effects of misinformation using predefined social noise constructs. The dataset consists of 500,000 tweets collected from the X platform using the Ukraine hashtag during the Russia-Ukraine conflict from March 2024 to March 2025. Advanced machine learning models achieve strong performance, with accuracies ranging from 79.94% to 97.17%. RoBERTa demonstrates the highest performance, with an accuracy of 97.17%, Cohen's kappa of 0.9660, MCC of 0.9660, and AUC of 0.9977. The GNN achieves an accuracy of 64.52% and an AUC of 0.899, demonstrating performance above random-chance classification by exploiting the relational structure between tweets. All text-based models achieve kappa values greater than 0.75, indicating substantial overall agreement. Explainable AI analysis using LIME reveals that 89.6% of predictive weight is attributed to contextual features rather than isolated keywords. The findings highlight that integrating social noise into AI pipelines enhances misinformation detection and supports more effective mitigation strategies in large-scale social media environments.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Oct 2026.

Builds on

21 of 54 references.

References · 21

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  3. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  4. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
  5. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,361
  6. 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,923
  7. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  8. 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,320
  9. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
  10. 2017Squeeze-and-Excitation Networkscited by 4,789
  11. 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,393
  12. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
9 more
  1. 2019A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networkscited by 2,919
  2. 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,552
  3. 2017Fake News Detection on Social Media: A Data Mining Perspectivecited by 336
  4. 2020Rumor Detection on Social Media with Bi-Directional Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 153
  5. 2019Fake News Detection on Social Media using Geometric Deep Learningcited by 118
  6. 2020GCAN: Graph-aware Co-Attention Networks for Explainable Fake News Detection on Social Mediacited by 109
  7. 2020FANG: Leveraging Social Context for Fake News Detection Using Graph Representationcited by 99
  8. 2023The science of fake newscited by 97
  9. 2021User Preference-aware Fake News Detectioncited by 79

Built on by

Not cited yet.