Mitigating Black-Box Score-Based Query Attacks via Gradient Confusion
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Score-based black-box adversarial attacks pose a serious threat to deployed machine learning systems by exploiting repeated model queries to craft adversarial examples, requiring neither access to model parameters nor architecture. Existing defenses predominantly rely on stochastic output perturbations, which fail to prevent determined attackers from recovering stable gradient estimates by increasing query budgets or averaging over randomness. In this work, we propose the Gradient Confusion Defense (GCD), a retraining-free, deterministic test-time wrapper that actively shapes the probability vector returned to querying adversaries. By solving a constrained optimization problem grounded in the model's Jacobian, GCD aligns the exposed logit-gradient with a target confusion direction that is maximally misaligned with the true adversarial loss gradient---increasing the query complexity of attacks without sacrificing predictive utility or top-1 accuracy. We provide rigorous theoretical analysis demonstrating that GCD provably slows gradient-estimation-based attacks and induces systematic accept/reject errors in random search-based attacks, with the confusion effect amplifying as the fraction of defended queries increases. Extensive experiments on CIFAR-10 and ImageNet across multiple architectures (ResNet-18, ResNet-50, ViT-B/16) and four state-of-the-art attacks confirm these predictions: GCD achieves state-of-the-art robustness, while incurring zero clean accuracy degradation. %Crucially, unlike randomization-based defenses, GCD's deterministic structure provides resilience against adaptive attacks that exploit stochasticity, making it well-suited for security-critical deployment settings.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Oct 2026.
Builds on
30 of 39 references.
References · 30
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
- 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,998
- 2015DeepFool: a simple and accurate method to fool deep neural networkscited by 1,318
- 2018Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examplescited by 1,268
- 2016Practical Black-Box Attacks against Machine Learningcited by 903
- 2017Ensemble Adversarial Training: Attacks and Defensescited by 840
- 2019Square Attack: a query-efficient black-box adversarial attack via random searchcited by 685
- 2017ZOO: Zeroth Order Optimization based Black-box Attacks to Deep Neural Networks without Training Substitute Modelscited by 666
- 2020Overfitting in adversarially robust deep learningcited by 506
- 2018Black-box Adversarial Attacks with Limited Queries and Informationcited by 501
18 more
- 2017Mitigating Adversarial Effects Through Randomizationcited by 383
- 2019HopSkipJumpAttack: A Query-Efficient Decision-Based Attackcited by 333
- 2019Provably Robust Deep Learning via Adversarially Trained Smoothed Classifierscited by 330
- 2019Simple Black-box Adversarial Attackscited by 251
- 2021Data Augmentation Can Improve Robustnesscited by 194
- 2017Towards Robust Neural Networks via Random Self-ensemblecited by 159
- 2018Prior Convictions: Black-Box Adversarial Attacks with Bandits and Priorscited by 146
- 2018Parametric Noise Injection: Trainable Randomness to Improve Deep Neural Network Robustness against Adversarial Attackcited by 125
- 2019Sign-OPT: A Query-Efficient Hard-label Adversarial Attackcited by 120
- 2020RayS: A Ray Searching Method for Hard-label Adversarial Attackcited by 96
- 2021Random Noise Defense Against Query-Based Black-Box Attackscited by 47
- 2023CGBA: Curvature-aware Geometric Black-box Attackcited by 21
- 2021Fighting Gradients with Gradients: Dynamic Defenses against Adversarial Attackscited by 20
- 2022Adversarial Attack on Attackers: Post-Process to Mitigate Black-Box Score-Based Query Attackscited by 19
- 2024BruSLeAttack: A Query-Efficient Score-Based Black-Box Sparse Adversarial Attackcited by 8
- 2022Boundary Defense Against Black-box Adversarial Attackscited by 6
- 2023Understanding the Robustness of Randomized Feature Defense Against Query-Based Adversarial Attackscited by 4
- 2026Random Logit Scaling: Defending Deep Neural Networks Against Black-Box Score-Based Adversarial Example Attackscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.