mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

PerturbBridge: Direct Phenotypic Supervision for Cellular Perturbation Generation

arXiv 2610.17066 ↗First posted 12 Oct 2026cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Virtual cell models should capture phenotypes induced by specific perturbations. However, image-based models are typically trained and evaluated to match real-image distributions, which alone does not explicitly prioritize perturbation-specific biological responses. Recent approaches add biological signals through reinforcement-learning post-training or inference-time steering, raising a central question: where should biological response information enter the generative pipeline? We introduce PerturbBridge, a stochastic data-to-data bridge model that directly supervises perturbation-specific phenotypes in predicted perturbed images during training. PerturbBridge jointly optimizes bridge regression and differentiable biological response losses, with biological gradients passing through a frozen image encoder. We further introduce perturbation-response evaluations based on downstream classification and retrieval. Across three microscopy benchmarks for perturbation profiling and subcellular imaging, PerturbBridge surpasses CellFlux in biological fidelity, image quality, and sampling efficiency. On BBBC021, mechanism-of-action classification improves by 5.66 and 7.5 percentage points with morphological and learned visual features, respectively. On JUMP and AllenCell, retrieval Hit@10 and Hit@1 improve by 1.77 and 7.15 percentage points, respectively. On BBBC021 and JUMP, PerturbBridge achieves lower FID with 80% fewer model evaluations than CellFlux. Overall, these results show that directly supervising perturbation responses during training improves phenotypic fidelity while enabling efficient cellular image generation. Code is available at https://github.com/yyc1215lll-creator/PerturbBridge.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Oct 2026.

Builds on

14 of 34 references.

References · 14

  1. 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,974
  2. 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,777
  3. 2020Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 2,829
  4. 2018Demystifying MMD GANscited by 1,293
  5. 2023I2SB: Image-to-Image Schr"odinger Bridgecited by 218
  6. 2023Exposing flaws of generative model evaluation metrics and their unfair treatment of diffusion modelscited by 205
  7. 2023Denoising Diffusion Bridge Modelscited by 178
  8. 2024How to Build the Virtual Cell with Artificial Intelligence: Priorities and Opportunitiescited by 57
  9. 2024Diffusion Bridge Implicit Modelscited by 49
  10. 2023Modelling Cellular Perturbations with the Sparse Additive Mechanism Shift Variational Autoencodercited by 38
  11. 2025CellFlux: Simulating Cellular Morphology Changes via Flow Matchingcited by 20
  12. 2023PhenDiff: Revealing Subtle Phenotypes with Diffusion Models in Real Imagescited by 11
2 more
  1. 2024Exploring the Design Space of Diffusion Bridge Modelscited by 3
  2. 2026CellFluxRL: Biologically-Constrained Virtual Cell Modeling via Reinforcement Learningcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.