Towards Complementary Keypoint Detection via Mixture of Detectors
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Keypoint detection plays a central role in geometric vision pipelines. Existing detectors exhibit complementary strengths across different scene structures and keypoint budgets, and reliance on a single detector often results in suboptimal keypoint distributions. Motivated by this observation, we propose Mixture of Detectors (MoD) for dense matching pipelines, a unified framework for complementary keypoint detection through the adaptive composition of heterogeneous detectors. MoD first distills heterogeneous detectors into a unified model, allowing diverse detection maps to be predicted efficiently within a single forward pass. Detector selection is subsequently formulated as a patch-wise, budget-conditioned decision process, in which a lightweight router assigns the most suitable detector to each local region. To avoid heuristic supervision, the router is trained with task-driven rewards derived from downstream matching quality, jointly capturing both keypoint quantity and precision. Extensive experiments on MegaDepth, ScanNet, and HPatches demonstrate that MoD consistently outperforms strong baselines across a wide range of keypoint budgets, demonstrating its effectiveness in improving keypoint distribution and downstream geometric performance.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Oct 2026.
Builds on
21 of 31 references.
References · 21
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
- 2017Outrageously Large Neural Networks: The Sparsely-Gated Mixture-of-Experts Layercited by 3,509
- 2017ScanNet: Richly-annotated 3D Reconstructions of Indoor Scenescited by 3,117
- 2019SuperGlue: Learning Feature Matching with Graph Neural Networkscited by 1,443
- 2017SuperPoint: Self-Supervised Interest Point Detection and Descriptioncited by 1,320
- 2021LoFTR: Detector-Free Local Feature Matching with Transformerscited by 984
- 2021Scaling Vision with Sparse Mixture of Expertscited by 747
- 2018MegaDepth: Learning Single-View Depth Prediction from Internet Photoscited by 737
- 2022Mixture-of-Experts with Expert Choice Routingcited by 623
- 2016Direct Sparse Odometrycited by 485
- 2020DISK: Learning local features with policy gradientcited by 312
- 2023RoMa: Robust Dense Feature Matchingcited by 302
9 more
- 2017HPatches: A benchmark and evaluation of handcrafted and learned local descriptorscited by 264
- 2022DKM: Dense Kernelized Feature Matching for Geometry Estimationcited by 177
- 2023ALIKED: A Lighter Keypoint and Descriptor Extraction Network via Deformable Transformationcited by 121
- 2023DeDoDe: Detect, Don't Describe -- Describe, Don't Detect for Local Feature Matchingcited by 63
- 2022DeepLSD: Line Segment Detection and Refinement with Deep Image Gradientscited by 60
- 2025RoMa v2: Harder Better Faster Denser Feature Matchingcited by 51
- 2021SOLD2: Self-supervised Occlusion-aware Line Description and Detectioncited by 47
- 2024DeDoDe v2: Analyzing and Improving the DeDoDe Keypoint Detectorcited by 39
- 2025DaD: Distilled Reinforcement Learning for Diverse Keypoint Detectioncited by 13
Built on by
Not cited yet.