mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Attention-Graph Curvature for the Verification of Mathematical Reasoning

arXiv 2610.16709 ↗First posted 12 Oct 2026cs.LG cs.CLcited by 0

On the map: LLM reasoning → Mathematical reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

Language models have recently solved open ErdHos problems and achieved gold-medal level performance on International Mathematical Olympiad problems. But their solutions, written in natural language, cannot yet be verified by proof assistants. An erroneous reasoning step can invalidate every step that comes after, so it is advantageous to detect errors early. Several methods have been proposed to detect erroneous reasoning quickly based on the features of the forward pass of the language model that performs reasoning. In this work, we study whether the directed Forman curvature of that model's attention graph, a local quantity computed at an edge from the attention weights around it, carries information about a step's correctness. To do so, we evaluate four per-step verifiers on ProcessBench with and without the curvature appended to their input. Appending curvature values improves the overall mean performance of all four verifiers. ReProbe, the verifier that takes every token of a step as input, shows the largest improvement. Adding the curvature increases the time of the language model's forward pass by 18% on average.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Mathematical reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 6 of its 12 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Oct 2026.

Builds on

6 of 12 references.

References · 6

  1. 2024ProcessBench: Identifying Process Errors in Mathematical Reasoningcited by 292
  2. 2025Reasoning Models Know When They're Right: Probing Hidden States for Self-Verificationcited by 159
  3. 2022Revisiting Over-smoothing and Over-squashing Using Ollivier-Ricci Curvaturecited by 98
  4. 2026Semi-Autonomous Mathematics Discovery with Gemini: A Case Study on the ErdHos Problemscited by 32
  5. 2025ReProbe: Efficient Test-Time Scaling of Multi-Step Reasoning by Probing Internal States of Large Language Modelscited by 10
  6. 2026Geometry of Reason: Spectral Signatures of Valid Mathematical Reasoningcited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Measuring Progress in Reasoning Toward Mathematical Discovery with Automatic Verification
  2. 2025Challenging the Boundaries of Reasoning: An Olympiad-Level Math Benchmark for Large Language Models
  3. 2026LiveMathematicianBench: A Live Benchmark for Research-Level Mathematical Reasoning with Proof Sketches
  4. 2025Putnam-AXIOM: A Functional and Static Benchmark for Measuring Higher Level Mathematical Reasoning in LLMs
  5. 2026AdvancedMathBench: A Benchmark Suite for Advanced Mathematical Proof Generation and Verification
  6. 2025Examining False Positives under Inference Scaling for Mathematical Reasoning
  7. 2023GraphReason: Enhancing Reasoning Capabilities of Large Language Models through A Graph-Based Verification Approach
  8. 2026Geometric Signatures of Reasoning: A Spectral Perspective on Task Hardness