GOTS: Greedy Orthogonal Token Selection for High-Resolution Vision-Language Models
On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Visual token pruning and efficiency
Abstract (arXiv)
Modern vision-language models (VLMs) increasingly rely on dynamic or high-resolution visual encoding, producing thousands of visual tokens that substantially increase downstream language-model inference cost. Existing token-reduction methods assess token utility through token-wise importance, query relevance, coverage, pairwise diversity, or subset-level objectives. Our key insight is to view visual token reduction through selected-span complementarity: instead of scoring a token in isolation or through pairwise relations, we assess how much of its feature is orthogonal to the span of the already retained subset. Based on this perspective, we propose Greedy Orthogonal Token Selection (GOTS), a training-free and query-agnostic method. At each step, GOTS selects the token with the largest residual energy orthogonal to the current retained span. This rule exactly maximizes the one-step augmented Gram determinant among candidate additions, giving each greedy step a precise local geometric guarantee for subset expansion. Across five high-resolution VLM backbones from the Qwen-VL and InternVL families and eleven diverse benchmarks, GOTS achieves higher average performance retention than the strongest evaluated baselines, and a controlled OCRBench study shows that it reduces model-side time-to-first-token after accounting for selection overhead. Code is available at https://github.com/newLLing/GOTS.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Visual token pruning and efficiency, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 7 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Jul 2026.
Builds on
7 of 17 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2025MMTok: Multimodal Coverage Maximization for Efficient Inference of VLMs25 Aug
- 2025Beyond Attention or Similarity: Maximizing Conditional Diversity for Token Pruning in MLLMs12 Jun
Other references · 5
- 2023Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 4,418
- 2023InstructBLIP: Towards General-purpose Vision-Language Models with Instruction Tuningcited by 2,876
- 2019Towards VQA Models That Can Readcited by 1,718
- 2023MathVista: Evaluating Mathematical Reasoning of Foundation Models in Visual Contextscited by 1,614
- 2025InternVL3.5: Advancing Open-Source Multimodal Models in Versatility, Reasoning, and Efficiencycited by 1,510
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Attention-Free and Lightweight Token Reduction for Efficient Vision-Language Models
- 2026The Model Knows Which Tokens Matter: Automatic Token Selection via Noise Gating
- 2026ResPrune: Text-Conditioned Subspace Reconstruction for Visual Token Pruning in Large Vision-Language Models
- 2025GreedyPrune: Retenting Critical Visual Token Set for Large Vision Language Models
- 2024SparseVLM: Visual Token Sparsification for Efficient Vision-Language Model Inference
- 2025VScan: Rethinking Visual Token Reduction for Efficient Large Vision-Language Models
- 2026One Layer's Trash is Another Layer's Treasure: Adaptive Layer-wise Visual Token Selection in LVLMs
- 2024Inference Optimal VLMs Need Fewer Visual Tokens and More Parameters