A temporal graph dissimilarity measure capturing epidemic spreading behavior
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Comparing temporal networks is a challenging problem in network analysis. Commonly adopted methods compare structural properties of temporal graphs and can be highly sensitive to the pre-selected features. However, temporal networks are the support of dynamical processes, and a process may take place in statistically indistinguishable ways on structurally different temporal graphs. In particular, a dissimilarity measure that compares temporal graphs based on how spreading processes unfold on them is highly desirable. In this work, we first define the Time-Shift DTW, a dissimilarity between epidemic curves that accounts for both differences in their shape and temporal shifts. We then introduce Epidemic-Aware Temporal Graph Dissimilarity (EATGD), a deterministic and differentiable dissimilarity between temporal graphs that combines an embedding-based temporal graph distance with a set of topological and temporal features. Its parameters are calibrated using stochastic SIR simulations to maximize the correlation with the Time-Shift DTW, after which graph comparisons require no further epidemic simulations. Using empirical human proximity networks from the SocioPatterns collaboration and synthetic temporal graphs, we show that EATGD captures epidemic-based graph dissimilarity and generalizes across heterogeneous network settings. Its differentiability and computational efficiency make EATGD suitable for integration into machine-learning pipelines and provide a potential loss function for training generative models to reproduce epidemic dynamics without requiring an exact reconstruction of fine-grained network structure.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 68 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Oct 2026.
Builds on
26 of 68 references.
References · 26
- 2023Graph Neural Networks for temporal graphs: State of the art, open challenges, and opportunitiescited by 61
- 2015Contact patterns in a high school: a comparison between data collected using wearable sensors, contact diaries and friendship surveyscited by 60
- 2013Spectral redemption: clustering sparse networkscited by 56
- 2018NetLSD: Hearing the Shape of a Graphcited by 52
- 2019Metrics for Graph Comparison: A Practitioner's Guidecited by 38
- 2024A survey of dynamic graph neural networkscited by 24
- 2013DELTACON: A Principled Massive-Graph Similarity Functioncited by 18
- 2013Memory in network flows and its effects on spreading dynamics and community detectioncited by 18
- 2014Contact patterns among high school studentscited by 18
- 2017Can co-location be used as a proxy for face-to-face contacts?cited by 13
- 2023DYMOND: DYnamic MOtif-NoDes Network Generative Modelcited by 11
- 2017A Framework for Evaluating Epidemic Forecastscited by 8
14 more
- 2018An information-theoretic, all-scales approach to comparing networkscited by 8
- 2014Measuring large-scale social networks with high resolutioncited by 7
- 2020A unified framework for spectral clustering in sparse graphscited by 7
- 2024A Primer on Temporal Graph Learningcited by 5
- 2024Automatic feature selection and weighting in molecular systems using Differentiable Information Imbalancecited by 5
- 2014How memory generates heterogeneous dynamics in temporal networkscited by 4
- 2024An embedding-based distance for temporal graphscited by 4
- 2013Time varying networks and the weakness of strong tiescited by 3
- 2018Bursty Human Dynamicscited by 3
- 2021Quantitative Evaluation of Snapshot Graphs for the Analysis of Temporal Networkscited by 2
- 2022Generating fine-grained surrogate temporal networkscited by 2
- 2023Learning distributed representations with efficient SoftMax normalizationcited by 2
- 2015Compensating for population sampling in simulations of epidemic spread on temporal contact networkscited by 1
- 2025Modeling memory in time-respecting paths on temporal networkscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.