Visually Legible but Adversarial: Watermark-Constrained Attacks on End-to-End VLMs for Document Understanding
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Visible watermarks convey document ownership, confidentiality, and status, but can also carry adversarial signals. We introduce Auto-Regional Adversarial Watermarking (AR-AWM), a model-aware white-box attack on end-to-end visual language models (VLMs) for document understanding. AR-AWM constructs a small, spatially distributed watermark-text support and optimizes only its pixels to disrupt visual representations. The attack is untargeted and question-agnostic: generation uses no questions, answers, parsing prompts, language-model gradients, or language-model outputs. Each attacked page is reused across downstream queries. On Qwen2.5-VL-7B, a watermark support covering 7.98% of page pixels under the reporting threshold reduces DocVQA exact match from 0.899 to 0.150 and average normalized Levenshtein similarity (ANLS) from 0.939 to 0.212. Selected qualitative cases retain visually legible source fields. The same support without optimization and with matched random perturbations retains ANLS of 0.932 and 0.933, respectively, identifying adversarial optimization as the primary cause of degradation. Layout-matched optimized rectangles yield ANLS of 0.276, showing an incremental benefit from text-shaped geometry. AR-AWM also degrades all reported text, formula, reading-order, and table metrics on OmniDocBench. Separate white-box optimization on InternVL2.5-8B reduces ANLS from 0.922 to 0.046, while weak cross-model transfer reveals strong encoder specificity. These results identify conventional watermark-shaped supports as an adversarial surface for document VLMs in the evaluated white-box setting.luated white-box setting.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Oct 2026.
Builds on
13 of 24 references.
References · 13
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
- 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,998
- 2020DocVQA: A Dataset for VQA on Document Imagescited by 1,317
- 2023FigStep: Jailbreaking Large Vision-Language Models via Typographic Visual Promptscited by 398
- 2018HiDDeN: Hiding Data With Deep Networkscited by 397
- 2023Visual Adversarial Examples Jailbreak Aligned Large Language Modelscited by 328
- 2023Image Hijacks: Adversarial Images can Control Generative Models at Runtimecited by 172
- 2024OmniDocBench: Benchmarking Diverse PDF Document Parsing with Comprehensive Annotationscited by 150
- 2023Set-level Guidance Attack: Boosting Adversarial Transferability of Vision-Language Pre-training Modelscited by 108
- 2023AdvCLIP: Downstream-agnostic Adversarial Examples in Multimodal Contrastive Learningcited by 103
- 2020FAWA: Fast Adversarial Watermark Attack on Optical Character Recognition (OCR) Systemscited by 8
1 more
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025VLA-Mark: A cross modal watermark for large vision-language alignment model
- 2024PostMark: A Robust Blackbox Watermark for Large Language Models
- 2025Signature vs. Substance: Evaluating the Balance of Adversarial Resistance and Linguistic Quality in Watermarking Large Language Models
- 2024Provably Robust Watermarks for Open-Source Language Models
- 2024Black-Box Detection of Language Model Watermarks
- 2024On Evaluating The Performance of Watermarked Machine-Generated Texts Under Adversarial Attacks
- 2026FeatMark: Feature-level Watermark Protection against Mimicry Attacks with Diffusion Models
- 2025PRO: Enabling Precise and Robust Text Watermark for Open-Source LLMs