mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

ProML: Progressive Multi-label Learning

arXiv 2610.15614 ↗First posted 11 Oct 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Multi-label learning typically pursues model construction through the joint optimization of label fitting, correlation modeling, and structural regularization. While empirically effective, such a coupled paradigm imposes multiple learning objectives on a single predictive parameter matrix, forcing it to simultaneously fit observed labels and encode structural priors. This coupling may induce ill-conditioned optimization geometry, increase hyper-parameter sensitivity, and complicate capacity control. To address the these issues, this paper proposes a Progressive Multi-Label Learning (ProML) framework, which decouples direct label fitting from predictor learning via the introduction of an auxiliary predictive variable. This auxiliary variable admits a closed-form solution, yielding an equivalent profiled objective in which the supervised fitting term is scaled by a trade-off parameter. This result provides a unified view of ProML and conventional coupled learning, with the latter recovered as a limiting case. We theoretically analyze the optimization geometry of ProML and show that, under quadratic positive semidefinite structural regularization, ProML attenuates the dominant curvature of the fitting term, enlarges the stable learning rate range, and provides a controllable fidelity-regularization trade-off. Further, we instantiate the ProML for multi-label feature selection task by integrating global-local label priors and row-sparse regularization. Extensive experiments and controlled optimization analyses on 12 benchmark datasets empirically corroborate the theoretical analysis and demonstrate the robust and competitive performance of the proposed method.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Oct 2026.

Builds on

12 of 48 references.

References · 12

  1. 2018Multi-Task Learning as Multi-Objective Optimizationcited by 821
  2. 2015Train faster, generalize better: Stability of stochastic gradient descentcited by 552
  3. 2019An Investigation into Neural Net Optimization via Hessian Eigenvalue Densitycited by 292
  4. 2014Label Distribution Learningcited by 124
  5. 2020The Emerging Trends of Multi-Label Learningcited by 100
  6. 2014CNN: Single-label to Multi-labelcited by 63
  7. 2017Multi-Label Learning with Global and Local Label Correlationcited by 40
  8. 2019Hierarchical Taxonomy-Aware and Attentional Graph Capsule RCNNs for Large-Scale Multi-Label Text Classificationcited by 32
  9. 2021Evaluating Multi-label Classifiers with Noisy Labelscited by 10
  10. 2022Multi-label Classification with High-rank and High-order Label Correlationscited by 8
  11. 2017Regularizing Model Complexity and Label Structure for Multi-Label Text Classificationcited by 2
  12. 2024Embedded Multi-label Feature Selection via Orthogonal Regressioncited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.