mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

REPRO: Reflective Evolutionary Prompt Optimizer for Automated LLM Red-Teaming

arXiv 2610.15513 ↗First posted 11 Oct 2026cs.CL cs.AI cs.NEcited by 0

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Safety alignment and jailbreak attacks

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Safety-aligned large language models (LLMs) remain vulnerable to adversarial prompts that bypass their safety training. Existing automated red-teaming methods either require privileged access unavailable in production, rely on manually engineered per-model templates, or optimize a single objective without population-level diversity. We present REPRO (Reflective Evolutionary Prompt Optimization), a pure black-box framework that discovers adversarial prompts through evolutionary optimization driven entirely by a compressed open-weight 7B reflective model on a single consumer GPU. REPRO introduces two mechanisms absent from prior work, both isolated in a component ablation: semantic crossover, an LLM-guided multi-parent recombination operator, and Bayesian strategy selection via Thompson Sampling informed by structured failure analysis. We catalog REPRO's behavior on AdvBench, JailbreakBench, and HarmBench across 36 target models from 11 families, including GPT-5-nano, Claude-3.5-Sonnet, Gemini-2.5-Pro, and Grok-4.1. Under our protocol REPRO reaches 100% attack success rate (ASR) on every evaluated target in a single turn, at a median of 24 target queries per behavior. Two properties of the protocol qualify that figure. The judge scoring candidates during optimization also produces the reported ASR, and search halts when it accepts, so ASR reports whether search succeeded within the iteration budget rather than success at a fixed budget. All baseline figures are transcribed from their original papers, which use different judges, budgets, and model versions. We therefore present this as a catalog of model coverage under one protocol rather than a head-to-head ranking, and develop both qualifications in the paper.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Safety alignment and jailbreak attacks, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 29 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Oct 2026.

Builds on

29 of 45 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Models27 Jul

Other references · 28

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  3. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
  4. 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 3,050
  5. 2023Jailbroken: How Does LLM Safety Training Fail?cited by 1,651
  6. 2023Not what you've signed up for: Compromising Real-World LLM-Integrated Applications with Indirect Prompt Injectioncited by 1,443
  7. 2024HarmBench: A Standardized Evaluation Framework for Automated Red Teaming and Robust Refusalcited by 1,429
  8. 2023Jailbreaking Black Box Large Language Models in Twenty Queriescited by 1,420
  9. 2022Red Teaming Language Models with Language Modelscited by 1,026
  10. 2023DSPy: Compiling Declarative Language Model Calls into Self-Improving Pipelinescited by 832
  11. 2019Universal Adversarial Triggers for Attacking and Analyzing NLPcited by 722
  12. 2023Tree of Attacks: Jailbreaking Black-Box LLMs Automaticallycited by 672
16 more
  1. 2024How Johnny Can Persuade LLMs to Jailbreak Them: Rethinking Persuasion to Challenge AI Safety by Humanizing LLMscited by 573
  2. 2023GPTFUZZER: Red Teaming Large Language Models with Auto-Generated Jailbreak Promptscited by 560
  3. 2024Jailbreaking Leading Safety-Aligned LLMs with Simple Adaptive Attackscited by 486
  4. 2024Great, Now Write an Article About That: The Crescendo Multi-Turn LLM Jailbreak Attackcited by 390
  5. 2023DeepInception: Hypnotize Large Language Model to Be Jailbreakercited by 367
  6. 2023Low-Resource Languages Jailbreak GPT-4cited by 309
  7. 2023Exploiting Programmatic Behavior of LLMs: Dual-Use Through Standard Security Attackscited by 278
  8. 2024Rainbow Teaming: Open-Ended Generation of Diverse Adversarial Promptscited by 205
  9. 2024AutoDAN-Turbo: A Lifelong Agent for Strategy Self-Exploration to Jailbreak LLMscited by 199
  10. 2024AmpleGCG: Learning a Universal and Transferable Generative Model of Adversarial Suffixes for Jailbreaking Both Open and Closed LLMscited by 172
  11. 2023Software Testing with Large Language Models: Survey, Landscape, and Visioncited by 166
  12. 2023Use of LLMs for Illicit Purposes: Threats, Prevention Measures, and Vulnerabilitiescited by 82
  13. 2026OpenRT: An Open-Source Red Teaming Framework for Multimodal LLMscited by 21
  14. 2024Diversity Helps Jailbreak Large Language Modelscited by 10
  15. 2025KDA: A Knowledge-Distilled Attacker for Generating Diverse Prompts to Jailbreak LLMscited by 5
  16. 2026A Red Teaming Framework for Large Language Models: A Case Study on Faithfulness Evaluationcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025RainbowPlus: Enhancing Adversarial Prompt Generation via Evolutionary Quality-Diversity Search
  2. 2025Be a Multitude to Itself: A Prompt Evolution Framework for Red Teaming
  3. 2025AutoRed: A Free-form Adversarial Prompt Generation Framework for Automated Red Teaming
  4. 2025Learning-Based Automated Adversarial Red-Teaming for Robustness Evaluation of Large Language Models
  5. 2026AdversaBench: Automated LLM Red-Teaming with Multi-Judge Confirmation and Cross-Model Transferability
  6. 2025Automatic LLM Red Teaming
  7. 2026EvoFlint: An Evolutionary Atlas of Multi-Turn LLM Vulnerabilities
  8. 2024Ferret: Faster and Effective Automated Red Teaming with Reward-Based Scoring Technique