mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

MoSAIC: Learning DAG Scheduling Heuristics from Optimal Schedules through Motif-Aware Recovery and LLM-Guided Reasoning

arXiv 2610.15205 ↗First posted 10 Oct 2026cs.AR cs.IR cs.LGcited by 0

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning for agents, planning and code also fits: Test-time compute and efficient thinking

Abstract (arXiv)

Efficient task scheduling in heterogeneous computing systems remains a fundamental challenge in embedded and high-level synthesis flows. This paper presents MoSAIC (Motif-aware Scheduling with AI-driven Cognition), a learning-based framework that bridges the gap between exact and heuristic scheduling approaches for DAG-based applications. The system uses the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs) to learn the relationships between DAG structures and scheduling priority functions. The framework first leverages the OR-Tools CP-SAT solver [4] to generate optimal schedules, which are then used to supervise the learning of compact priority-based scheduling functions through Bayesian Optimization. These learned heuristics capture relationships between scheduling decisions and structural graph features such as rank, depth, and fanout, enabling the construction of a reusable knowledge base across diverse DAG instances. Experimental results across synthetic graph families and real-world benchmarks, including PolyBench and MachSuite, show that the learned heuristics consistently improve over classical approaches such as HEFT [2], while maintaining low runtime overhead. The results indicate that combining optimal supervision with learning-based generalization provides a practical approach for scalable and adaptive task scheduling.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning for agents, planning and code, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 6 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Oct 2026.

Builds on

6 of 23 references.

References · 6

  1. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
  2. 2018Attention, Learn to Solve Routing Problems!cited by 656
  3. 2018Machine Learning for Combinatorial Optimization: a Methodological Tour d'Horizoncited by 623
  4. 2016Neural Combinatorial Optimization with Reinforcement Learningcited by 608
  5. 2018Reinforcement Learning for Solving the Vehicle Routing Problemcited by 333
  6. 2017Device Placement Optimization with Reinforcement Learningcited by 86

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026A Learning Method with Gap-Aware Generation for Heterogeneous DAG Scheduling
  2. 2025GraphPerf-RT: A Graph-Driven Performance Model for Hardware-Aware Scheduling of OpenMP Codes
  3. 2026RAG-Enhanced Kernel-Based Heuristic Synthesis (RKHS): A Structured Methodology Using Large Language Models for Hardware Design ↗
  4. 2025Evaluating Large Language Models for Workload Mapping and Scheduling in Heterogeneous HPC Systems
  5. 2026TRACE: Tackling Real-World Resource Assignment Problems via Agentic Heuristic Design
  6. 2026MOSAIC: Efficient Mixture-of-Agent Scheduling via Adaptive Aggregation and Inference Concurrency
  7. 2025GATES: Cost-aware Dynamic Workflow Scheduling via Graph Attention Networks and Evolution Strategy
  8. 2026Scheduling That Speaks: An Interpretable Programmatic Reinforcement Learning Framework