Verify, Act, Distill: Turning Test-Time Compute into Test-Time Adaptation for Vision-Language-Action Models
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reinforcement learning for reasoning also fits: Multimodal reasoning
also in 2 more
Abstract (arXiv)
Test-time compute (TTC), which scores multiple candidate actions at inference time, is a powerful way to improve the execution performance of vision-language-action (VLA) models, but existing methods keep the policy frozen, so the gain must be recomputed at every execution. We propose Verify, Act, Distill, a framework that consolidates the gains of TTC into the VLA itself. A fixed verifier scores candidates generated by a flow-matching VLA, the weighted aggregate is executed, and the observations and aggregated chunks from successful adaptation episodes are distilled directly into LoRA parameters with the standard flow-matching loss. This reuses supervision that TTC has already produced during execution, without additional reinforcement learning or rollouts dedicated to teacher generation. On the 40 LIBERO tasks with a SmolVLA 5k checkpoint, distilling from only 10 episodes per task raises the mean success rate of verifier-free single-candidate generation from 54.1% to 70.6%, retaining about 74% of the improvement obtained by aggregating eight candidates. Applying the same aggregation to the distilled policy further raises the success rate from 76.4% to 82.3%, with a particularly large gain on LIBERO-Long (44.0% to 57.8%), and the single-candidate policy also improves on LIBERO-plus, which contains distribution shifts. These results show that using verification as a learning signal, rather than only as an execution-time selector, both retains the improvements of TTC and re-amplifies the effect of subsequent TTC.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reinforcement learning for reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. First posted on arXiv 10 Oct 2026.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Scaling Verification Can Be More Effective than Scaling Policy Learning for Vision-Language-Action Alignment
- 2026VANE: Reliable Test-Time Training for Vision-Language-Action Models via Future Visual Representation Prediction
- 2026Fewer Steps, Better Actions: Rethinking Flow-Matching Inference for VLA Policies
- 2025Efficient Test-Time Scaling for Small Vision-Language Models
- 2026Look Before You Leap: Distilling Tree Search into Action Evaluation for Frozen VLA Models
- 2025EVOLVE-VLA: Test-Time Training from Environment Feedback for Vision-Language-Action Models
- 2025Steering Vision-Language-Action Models as Anti-Exploration: A Test-Time Scaling Approach
- 2026On-the-Fly VLA Adaptation via Test-Time Reinforcement Learning