Who to Trust in Multi-Robot Systems: Joint Robot and Object Hypothesis Trust Inference via Neural-Symbolic Cross-Validation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Multi-robot systems (MRS) offer significant advantages over single-robot platforms by enabling information sharing and coordination for different tasks in complex environments. However, reliable cooperation critically depends on inferring trust over both information sources and their reported hypotheses, particularly under partial observability and potential adversarial interference. Existing approaches frequently depend on pre-established trust relationships or side-channel information, which may not be available or reliable in realistic MRS deployments. This work introduces NeST-Bayes, a neural-symbolic framework that jointly infers robot and hypothesis trust using only inter-robot observation consistency, without requiring preassigned robot trust, reputation information, or side-channel identity signals. NeST-Bayes infers instantaneous trust evidence scores for robots and object hypotheses by reasoning over ego-centric relational graphs constructed from cross-robot observation consistency. These evidence scores are accumulated over time through Bayesian updates of Beta-distributed trust beliefs to maintain temporally consistent trust estimates. Extensive evaluations show that NeST-Bayes achieves the highest mean object precision and robot recall across all benchmark settings, and the highest robot precision and object recall in most settings, compared to trust-based methods. Under aggressive optimized attacks, it achieves 98.8% robot precision with 93.8% recall and 98.3% object precision with 95.4% recall. In an occlusion-rich Webots warehouse, it maintains 92.5% robot precision with 92.0% recall and 97.3% object precision with 85.0% recall. These results demonstrate joint improvements in the reliability and coverage of retained information.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Oct 2026.
Builds on
22 of 45 references.
References · 22
- 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,923
- 2019Neural Probabilistic Logic Programming in DeepProbLogcited by 394
- 2017A simple neural network module for relational reasoningcited by 346
- 2017Neural-Symbolic Learning and Reasoning: A Survey and Interpretationcited by 196
- 2017End-to-End Differentiable Provingcited by 161
- 2019Neural-Symbolic Computing: An Effective Methodology for Principled Integration of Machine Learning and Reasoningcited by 151
- 2019Neural Logic Machinescited by 145
- 2022Partially Observable Markov Decision Processes in Robotics: A Surveycited by 86
- 2022Learning Neuro-Symbolic Skills for Bilevel Planningcited by 58
- 2021Kimera-Multi: Robust, Distributed, Dense Metric-Semantic SLAM for Multi-Robot Systemscited by 54
- 2024VisualPredicator: Learning Abstract World Models with Neuro-Symbolic Predicates for Robot Planningcited by 39
- 2022Multi-Robot Collaborative Perception with Graph Neural Networkscited by 35
10 more
- 2023A Framework for Neurosymbolic Robot Action Planning using Large Language Modelscited by 12
- 2022Learning Neuro-symbolic Programs for Language Guided Robot Manipulationcited by 10
- 2023Bandit Submodular Maximization for Multi-Robot Coordination in Unpredictable and Partially Observable Environmentscited by 6
- 2025Security-Aware Sensor Fusion with MATE: the Multi-Agent Trust Estimatorcited by 4
- 2022Exploiting Trust for Resilient Hypothesis Testing with Malicious Robotscited by 3
- 2023Enabling Team of Teams: A Trust Inference and Propagation (TIP) Model in Multi-Human Multi-Robot Teamscited by 3
- 2024Bayesian Methods for Trust in Collaborative Multi-Agent Autonomycited by 3
- 2025COMRES-VLM: Coordinated Multi-Robot Exploration and Search using Vision Language Modelscited by 2
- 2023Dynamic Crowd Vetting: Collaborative Detection of Malicious Robots in Dynamic Communication Networkscited by 1
- 2025Multi-Robot Coordination with Adversarial Perceptioncited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.