Coarse-Graining Recursive Expert Computation: Continuation-Relative Interfaces and Failure Modes
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Computational coarse-graining aims to replace a sequence of updates with a cheaper module while preserving task performance. We present a continuation-relative evaluation framework that assesses replacements through the computation that follows them, using downstream task quality and total execution cost as joint criteria. The framework distinguishes boundary representations, summaries of skipped computation, executed operations, and downstream loss. It makes interfaces and permitted deployment information explicit, combines fine-path references with directly trained controls using the same shortened architecture, and accounts for selection overhead. An exact loss decomposition separates replacement effects at a fixed downstream action from effects of changing that action. A finite construction shows how retained information can reduce the stipulated cost of zero-error prediction under fixed information and controller restrictions. Experiments in two frozen pretrained language models show that representation fidelity and task loss can favor different fitting objectives. In a prespecified comparison on a 1.7-billion-parameter model, next-token-loss training lowers in-distribution negative log-likelihood by 0.1901 nats per scored token compared with reconstructing the skipped blocks' output, using the same optimizer and update count. This ranking reverses in all nine paired comparisons under distribution shift. In a recursive expert prototype, the jointly adapted candidate lowers task error relative to frozen-bank and router-only baselines, but trails directly trained controls, and the tested input-only selectors fail the joint quality-cost criteria. Together, the protocol and studies provide explicit criteria and diagnostics for distinguishing useful computational replacement from local approximation gains within specified interfaces and evaluation settings.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 42 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Oct 2026.
Builds on
42 of 50 references.
References · 42
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
- 2022Flow Straight and Fast: Learning to Generate and Transfer Data with Rectified Flowcited by 3,700
- 2017Outrageously Large Neural Networks: The Sparsely-Gated Mixture-of-Experts Layercited by 3,509
- 2016Pointer Sentinel Mixture Modelscited by 3,096
- 2021Switch Transformers: Scaling to Trillion Parameter Models with Simple and Efficient Sparsitycited by 3,073
- 2023Consistency Modelscited by 1,822
- 2024The FineWeb Datasets: Decanting the Web for the Finest Text Data at Scalecited by 1,160
- 2016The LAMBADA dataset: Word prediction requiring a broad discourse contextcited by 992
- 2019Deep Equilibrium Modelscited by 615
- 2018Rethinking the Value of Network Pruningcited by 599
- 2025Mean Flows for One-step Generative Modelingcited by 561
- 2024One Step Diffusion via Shortcut Modelscited by 391
30 more
- 2022Confident Adaptive Language Modelingcited by 310
- 2024Mixture-of-Depths: Dynamically allocating compute in transformer-based language modelscited by 258
- 2021Does Knowledge Distillation Really Work?cited by 190
- 2024Not All Experts are Equal: Efficient Expert Pruning and Skipping for Mixture-of-Experts Large Language Modelscited by 146
- 2025Mixture-of-Recursions: Learning Dynamic Recursive Depths for Adaptive Token-Level Computationcited by 133
- 2020BERT-of-Theseus: Compressing BERT by Progressive Module Replacingcited by 113
- 2020Objective Mismatch in Model-based Reinforcement Learningcited by 96
- 2020The Value Equivalence Principle for Model-Based Reinforcement Learningcited by 94
- 2021Similarity and Matching of Neural Network Representationscited by 78
- 2024Identifying Functionally Important Features with End-to-End Sparse Dictionary Learningcited by 67
- 2026Flow Map Language Models: One-step Language Modeling via Continuous Denoisingcited by 66
- 2026LoopFormer: Elastic-Depth Looped Transformers for Latent Reasoning via Shortcut Modulationcited by 61
- 2021Learning Student-Friendly Teacher Networks for Knowledge Distillationcited by 60
- 2024Streamlining Redundant Layers to Compress Large Language Modelscited by 35
- 2025System-1.5 Reasoning: Traversal in Language and Latent Spaces with Dynamic Shortcutscited by 27
- 2026Self-conditioned Flow Map Language Models via Fixed-point Flowscited by 14
- 2025ReplaceMe: Network Simplification via Depth Pruning and Transformer Block Linearizationcited by 13
- 2025MoEcho: Exploiting Side-Channel Attacks to Compromise User Privacy in Mixture-of-Experts LLMscited by 13
- 2026Thinking with Looped Flowscited by 9
- 2025Every Expert Matters: Towards Effective Knowledge Distillation for Mixture-of-Experts Language Modelscited by 6
- 2026Task-Conditioned Routing Signatures in Sparse Mixture-of-Experts Transformerscited by 3
- 2025Leave It to the Experts: Detecting Knowledge Distillation via MoE Expert Signaturescited by 2
- 2026Consistency Deep Equilibrium Modelscited by 2
- 2026The Thinking Pixel: Recursive Sparse Reasoning in Multimodal Diffusion Latentscited by 2
- 2026Ghosted Layers: Unconstrained Activation Alignment for Recovering Layer-Pruned LLMscited by 2
- 2026Counterfactual Quotient Models: Learning What Actions Change, Not What the World Doescited by 2
- 2017Dynamic Model Selection for Prediction Under a Budgetcited by 1
- 2026Small LLMs: Pruning vs. Training from Scratchcited by 1
- 2026Knowledge Distillation under Teacher Misspecification: An Order-Parameter Analysis of the Gap between Teacher Mimicry and Task Performancecited by 1
- 2026LiFT: Loop Flow Transformerscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.