Can Language Models Play the Wikipedia Game?
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Language models increasingly support or automate information retrieval from document collections too large to index. This task is difficult when it requires specialist linguistic or scientific knowledge. We used the Wikipedia Game to test language models on an analogous information retrieval task. In the game, players must reach a target article using only article links. We compared sentence embedding models and LLMs across five Wikipedia languages and five academic-literature datasets. We construct very large local graphs of Wikipedia pages and of paper citations using OpenAlex and provide code to build and navigate them. This allows the study of language models' navigation capabilities without relying on third-party APIs. We compared the models with human and TF-IDF benchmarks. The Wikipedia Game format enables robust comparisons across techniques, languages, and domains. No model significantly outperformed humans, although the best models (GPT-o3 mini, GPT-4o, QwQ:32B, and DeepSeek-R1:70B) achieved comparable success. Performance and rankings varied across languages and topics, with implications for practitioners utilising these techniques.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 9 Oct 2026.
Builds on
0 of 0 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026SimpleWikiSearch: A Clean Offline Wikipedia Environment for Agentic Search
- 2026Where's Waldo? Query-language Preference under Cross-lingual Knowledge Disparities
- 2024ResearchArena: Benchmarking Large Language Models' Ability to Collect and Organize Information as Research Agents
- 2025Wikipedia in the Era of LLMs: Evolution and Risks
- 2024Language agents achieve superhuman synthesis of scientific knowledge
- 2026Wikidata Search Traces: A Dataset for Training Knowledge Graph Search Agents
- 2025Haystack Engineering: Context Engineering for Heterogeneous and Agentic Long-Context Evaluation
- 2024Who's Who: Large Language Models Meet Knowledge Conflicts in Practice