From Pixels to Privacy-Sensitive Features: An Information-Theoretic Framework for Reconstruction Bounds
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
What can an adversary recover from a model trained with DP-SGD? Its (varepsilon,δ) guarantee does not answer this question directly. We derive a distortion bound that can be computed before training and applies even to an adversary who observes the parameter trajectory during training, knows every other training record and the population distribution from which the training records are drawn. The analyst may choose the representation in which error is measured, allowing the bound to target the aspects of reconstruction that are privacy-sensitive in a given application. Our information-theoretic framework separates two contributions: the information about a record revealed by training, measured through conditional mutual information, and the uncertainty already present in the data distribution, measured through source entropy. Rate-distortion theory combines them into a lower bound on the expected error of every reconstruction attack. For DP-SGD, the leakage bound depends only on the sampling rates and noise multipliers, while the source entropy is lower-bounded from a sample with finite-sample confidence. An orthogonal block construction keeps the resulting bound informative for high-dimensional images. We instantiate the framework in pixel space and in LPIPS feature space, obtaining, to our knowledge, the first lower bound on reconstruction distortion measured directly by LPIPS. On a range of image datasets the bounds establish non-trivial unavoidable expected reconstruction error within heuristically recommended privacy-budget ranges and beyond. Experiments compare the bounds with strong reconstruction attacks and identify the principal sources of the remaining slack.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 34 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Oct 2026.
Builds on
34 of 48 references.
References · 34
- 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,177
- 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,693
- 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,728
- 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,189
- 2018Group Normalizationcited by 1,524
- 2019Deep Leakage from Gradientscited by 1,021
- 2020Inverting Gradients -- How easy is it to break privacy in federated learning?cited by 712
- 2021Opacus: User-Friendly Differential Privacy Library in PyTorchcited by 383
- 2022Unlocking High-Accuracy Differentially Private Image Classification through Scalecited by 224
- 2019R'enyi Differential Privacy of the Sampled Gaussian Mechanismcited by 204
- 2021Numerical Composition of Differential Privacycited by 180
- 2023How to DP-fy ML: A Practical Guide to Machine Learning with Differential Privacycited by 153
22 more
- 2022Reconstructing Training Data with Informed Adversariescited by 148
- 2022Reconstructing Training Data from Trained Neural Networkscited by 133
- 2018Protection Against Reconstruction and Its Applications in Private Federated Learningcited by 130
- 2021Optimal Accounting of Differential Privacy via Characteristic Functioncited by 86
- 2018Generalization Error Bounds for Noisy, Iterative Algorithmscited by 82
- 2022Bounding Training Data Reconstruction in Private (Deep) Learningcited by 46
- 2023Bounding Training Data Reconstruction in DP-SGDcited by 46
- 2016Differential Privacy as a Mutual Information Constraintcited by 45
- 2021Measuring Data Leakage in Machine-Learning Models with Fisher Informationcited by 33
- 2017Calibrating Noise to Variance in Adaptive Data Analysiscited by 29
- 2016Efficient multivariate entropy estimation via k-nearest neighbour distancescited by 28
- 2022PAC Privacy: Automatic Privacy Measurement and Control of Data Processingcited by 19
- 2021Martingale Methods for Sequential Estimation of Convex Functionals and Divergencescited by 18
- 2022Analyzing Privacy Leakage in Machine Learning via Multiple Hypothesis Testing: A Lesson From Fanocited by 17
- 2023Bounding data reconstruction attacks with the hypothesis testing interpretation of differential privacycited by 15
- 2025Unifying Re-Identification, Attribute Inference, and Data Reconstruction Risks in Differential Privacycited by 15
- 2023Bounding the Invertibility of Privacy-preserving Instance Encoding using Fisher Informationcited by 13
- 2024Defending Against Data Reconstruction Attacks in Federated Learning: An Information Theory Approachcited by 4
- 2013Rate-Distortion Theory for Secrecy Systemscited by 3
- 2024Guarantees of confidentiality via Hammersley-Chapman-Robbins boundscited by 3
- 2024Visual Privacy Auditing with Diffusion Modelscited by 2
- 2026Understanding Disclosure Risk in Differential Privacy with Applications to Noise Calibration and Auditing (Extended Version)cited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.