mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Defending Against Data Reconstruction Attacks in Federated Learning: An Information Theory Approach

arXiv 2403.01268 ↗First posted 2 Mar 2024cs.LG cs.CR cs.DCcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Federated Learning (FL) trains a black-box and high-dimensional model among different clients by exchanging parameters instead of direct data sharing, which mitigates the privacy leak incurred by machine learning. However, FL still suffers from membership inference attacks (MIA) or data reconstruction attacks (DRA). In particular, an attacker can extract the information from local datasets by constructing DRA, which cannot be effectively throttled by existing techniques, e.g., Differential Privacy (DP). In this paper, we aim to ensure a strong privacy guarantee for FL under DRA. We prove that reconstruction errors under DRA are constrained by the information acquired by an attacker, which means that constraining the transmitted information can effectively throttle DRA. To quantify the information leakage incurred by FL, we establish a channel model, which depends on the upper bound of joint mutual information between the local dataset and multiple transmitted parameters. Moreover, the channel model indicates that the transmitted information can be constrained through data space operation, which can improve training efficiency and the model accuracy under constrained information. According to the channel model, we propose algorithms to constrain the information transmitted in a single round of local training. With a limited number of training rounds, the algorithms ensure that the total amount of transmitted information is limited. Furthermore, our channel model can be applied to various privacy-enhancing techniques (such as DP) to enhance privacy guarantees against DRA. Extensive experiments with real-world datasets validate the effectiveness of our methods.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 42 of its 70 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Mar 2024.

Builds on

42 of 70 references.

References · 42

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  3. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
  4. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
  5. 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,679
  6. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
  7. 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,144
  8. 2018Learning deep representations by mutual information estimation and maximizationcited by 1,265
  9. 2021Membership Inference Attacks From First Principlescited by 839
  10. 2020Inverting Gradients -- How easy is it to break privacy in federated learning?cited by 707
  11. 2017Renyi Differential Privacycited by 643
  12. 2018Exploiting Unintended Feature Leakage in Collaborative Learningcited by 509
30 more
  1. 2017Opening the Black Box of Deep Neural Networks via Informationcited by 494
  2. 2017Deep Gradient Compression: Reducing the Communication Bandwidth for Distributed Trainingcited by 471
  3. 2021Opacus: User-Friendly Differential Privacy Library in PyTorchcited by 375
  4. 2020Label-Only Membership Inference Attackscited by 371
  5. 2017Deep Models Under the GAN: Information Leakage from Collaborative Deep Learningcited by 326
  6. 2020SplitFed: When Federated Learning Meets Split Learningcited by 308
  7. 2019White-box vs Black-box: Bayes Optimal Strategies for Membership Inferencecited by 265
  8. 2019Differentially Private Learning with Adaptive Clippingcited by 218
  9. 2018cpSGD: Communication-efficient and differentially-private distributed SGDcited by 157
  10. 2022Reconstructing Training Data with Informed Adversariescited by 143
  11. 2020LDP-Fed: Federated Learning with Local Differential Privacycited by 129
  12. 2022Reconstructing Training Data from Trained Neural Networkscited by 129
  13. 2022Automatic Clipping: Differentially Private Deep Learning Made Easier and Strongercited by 87
  14. 2021ML-Doctor: Holistic Risk Assessment of Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning Modelscited by 79
  15. 2021Learning with User-Level Privacycited by 72
  16. 2022Bounding Training Data Reconstruction in Private (Deep) Learningcited by 43
  17. 2023Bounding Training Data Reconstruction in DP-SGDcited by 42
  18. 2016Differential Privacy as a Mutual Information Constraintcited by 41
  19. 2020Learning discrete distributions: user vs item-level privacycited by 41
  20. 2021Measuring Data Leakage in Machine-Learning Models with Fisher Informationcited by 31
  21. 2018Deep Private-Feature Extractioncited by 30
  22. 2018Variance-based Gradient Compression for Efficient Distributed Deep Learningcited by 21
  23. 2022Differentially Private Learning with Per-Sample Adaptive Clippingcited by 21
  24. 2020TIPRDC: Task-Independent Privacy-Respecting Data Crowdsourcing Framework for Deep Learning with Anonymized Intermediate Representationscited by 17
  25. 2022Confidence-Ranked Reconstruction of Census Microdata from Published Statisticscited by 15
  26. 2019Privacy Accounting and Quality Control in the Sage Differentially Private ML Platformcited by 10
  27. 2022FedDef: Defense Against Gradient Leakage in Federated Learning-based Network Intrusion Detection Systemscited by 6
  28. 2020On the Efficient Estimation of Min-Entropycited by 3
  29. 2019Information-Theoretic Perspective of Federated Learningcited by 1
  30. 2020Estimating g-Leakage via Machine Learningcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3.

3 papers.