When Edge Independence Fails: Joint Graph Diffusion with Latent Sociability Priors
On the map: Diffusion models → Diffusion foundations and sampling also fits: Flow matching, time series and science
Abstract (arXiv)
Discrete graph diffusion models corrupt graph structure through independent edge updates with a Markovian noise model. Combined with the exchangeability requirement on the output distribution, the terminal prior is necessarily an ErdHos--R'enyi (E-R) random graph. This has a fundamental consequence for unconditional graph generation without node features: in the large graph limit, any GNN denoiser applied to an E-R graph approximately outputs an E-R graph, making effective denoising difficult. In practice, generated graphs fail to recover meaningful node heterogeneity and higher-order structure. Previous models introduced specialized node features to compensate, framing this as an expressivity problem, while the role of the prior remained unexamined. We instead address the root cause by introducing the Latent Sociability Prior (LSP) and a join diffusion process that co-evolves latent node sociability variables and graph structure, removing edge independence while preserving exchangeability. Unlike existing latent graph diffusion methods, the sociability mechanism requires no complex encoder: its sole role is to guide edge updates and preserve node heterogeneity throughout the trajectory. We validate our approach on multiple graph generation datasets and show that the proposed framework more accurately captures graph distributions than baseline methods without node features.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Diffusion foundations and sampling, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models. Builds on 38 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Oct 2026.
Builds on
38 of 52 references.
Closest ancestors · 3
Same direction, newest first
- 2021Structured Denoising Diffusion Models in Discrete State-Spaces7 Jul
- 2021Improved Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models18 Feb
- 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models19 Jun
Other references · 35
- 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,361
- 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,923
- 2015Deep Unsupervised Learning using Nonequilibrium Thermodynamicscited by 7,058
- 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,393
- 2019Generative Modeling by Estimating Gradients of the Data Distributioncited by 4,101
- 2019Fast Graph Representation Learning with PyTorch Geometriccited by 2,434
- 2016Variational Graph Auto-Encoderscited by 1,382
- 2020A Generalization of Transformer Networks to Graphscited by 661
- 2019Multi-scale Attributed Node Embeddingcited by 548
- 2022DiGress: Discrete Denoising diffusion for graph generationcited by 520
- 2024Discrete Flow Matchingcited by 317
- 2022Score-based Generative Modeling of Graphs via the System of Stochastic Differential Equationscited by 283
23 more
- 2020Permutation Invariant Graph Generation via Score-Based Generative Modelingcited by 270
- 2020The Surprising Power of Graph Neural Networks with Random Node Initializationcited by 198
- 2020Random Features Strengthen Graph Neural Networkscited by 186
- 2013Consistency of spectral clustering in stochastic block modelscited by 129
- 2024DeFoG: Discrete Flow Matching for Graph Generationcited by 82
- 2023Efficient and Degree-Guided Graph Generation via Discrete Diffusion Modelingcited by 80
- 2022Diffusion Models for Graphs Benefit From Discrete State Spacescited by 73
- 2023A Survey of Diffusion Based Image Generation Models: Issues and Their Solutionscited by 25
- 2014Sparse graphs using exchangeable random measurescited by 20
- 2023GraphMaker: Can Diffusion Models Generate Large Attributed Graphs?cited by 18
- 2021On the Power of Edge Independent Graph Modelscited by 16
- 2023What functions can Graph Neural Networks compute on random graphs? The role of Positional Encodingcited by 12
- 2025Bures-Wasserstein Flow Matching for Graph Generationcited by 9
- 2024Neural Graph Generator: Feature-Conditioned Graph Generation using Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 8
- 2020Sparse and Smooth: improved guarantees for Spectral Clustering in the Dynamic Stochastic Block Modelcited by 6
- 2021Re-parameterizing VAEs for stabilitycited by 6
- 2025Graph Diffusion that can Insert and Deletecited by 6
- 2026Principled Latent Diffusion for Graphs via Laplacian Autoencoderscited by 4
- 2026Prior-Informed Flow Matching for Graph Reconstructioncited by 4
- 2023On the Role of Edge Dependency in Graph Generative Modelscited by 3
- 2026Flowette: Flow Matching with Graphette Priors for Graph Generationcited by 3
- 2026Universality and Approximation Rates of Graph Neural Networks with Random Featurescited by 3
- 2025LGDC: Latent Graph Diffusion via Spectrum-Preserving Coarseningcited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Is Noise Conditioning Necessary? A Unified Theory of Unconditional Graph Diffusion Models
- 2025Simple and Critical Iterative Denoising: A Recasting of Discrete Diffusion in Graph Generation
- 2026From Uniform to Learned Graph Priors: Diffusion for Structure Discovery
- 2026Discrete Diffusion for Large Graph Generation via Structural Candidate Restriction
- 2023Sparse Training of Discrete Diffusion Models for Graph Generation
- 2023Leveraging Graph Diffusion Models for Network Refinement Tasks
- 2025DiffGraph: Heterogeneous Graph Diffusion Model
- 2023Complex Preferences for Different Convergent Priors in Discrete Graph Diffusion