Local Diagnostics of Learned Event Representations for Anomaly Detection at the HL-LHC
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Anomaly detection, the identification of collision events that deviate from Standard Model expectations, is one of the most promising model-agnostic strategies for new-physics searches at the Large Hadron Collider. Searching for rare events in learned low-dimensional representations removes the need to commit to hand-crafted observables a priori, but sacrifices the immediate physical interpretation those observables provide. For anomaly detection to enter a discovery pipeline, flagged events must therefore be diagnosed locally, both to distinguish potential new physics from mismodeling or detector effects and to identify observables for targeted follow-up searches. We evaluate supervised and self-supervised neural embedding strategies on COLLIDE-2V, a 750-million-event dataset simulated under realistic High-Luminosity LHC conditions, using the reconstruction error of an autoencoder trained in the learned latent space as the anomaly score. Across the configurations and benchmark signals considered, supervised objectives, which exploit simulation process labels during training, generally outperform their self-supervised counterparts and, in their best configurations, improve on an autoencoder trained directly on kinematic features, raising the signal efficiency at 10% background acceptance on all held-out processes. We further introduce a local diagnostic pipeline that fits a Gaussian Mixture Model to the SM latent space, profiles each component through high-level observables without process labels, localizes the flagged events, and ranks observables by their local discriminating power. The ranking recovers the defining kinematics of the held-out processes, while correlating the anomaly score with the same observables quantifies how closely the score tracks them, revealing cases where the most discriminating observable is not the one the score follows most closely.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Oct 2026.
Builds on
22 of 48 references.
References · 22
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
- 2020Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 2,829
- 2019Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Frameworkcited by 2,501
- 2021VICReg: Variance-Invariance-Covariance Regularization for Self-Supervised Learningcited by 1,057
- 2020Anomaly Detection with Density Estimationcited by 72
- 2024Masked Particle Modeling on Sets: Towards Self-Supervised High Energy Physics Foundation Modelscited by 46
- 2017Classification without labels: Learning from mixed samples in high energy physicscited by 43
- 2024OmniJet-α: The first cross-task foundation model for particle physicscited by 43
- 2018Variational Autoencoders for New Physics Mining at the Large Hadron Collidercited by 41
- 2023Machine Learning for Anomaly Detection in Particle Physicscited by 30
- 2021The Dark Machines Anomaly Score Challenge: Benchmark Data and Model Independent Event Classification for the Large Hadron Collidercited by 29
10 more
- 2023Explainable Equivariant Neural Networks for Particle Physics: PELICANcited by 24
- 2021Better Latent Spaces for Better Autoencoderscited by 21
- 2023Variance-Covariance Regularization Improves Representation Learningcited by 14
- 2025HEP-JEPA: A foundation model for collider physics using joint embedding predictive architecturecited by 13
- 2023Anomalies, Representations, and Self-Supervisioncited by 11
- 2022Neural Embedding: Learning the Embedding of the Manifold of Physics Datacited by 8
- 2022A Detailed Study of Interpretability of Deep Neural Network based Top Taggerscited by 7
- 2025Mixture-of-Experts Graph Transformers for Interpretable Particle Collision Detectioncited by 4
- 2024Universal New Physics Latent Spacecited by 3
- 2025An Evaluation of Representation Learning Methods in Particle Physics Foundation Modelscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.