mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Double-Take: Improving Capacity, Binding, and Selectivity In Long-Context Within Bidirectional Memory

arXiv 2610.13073 ↗First posted 9 Oct 2026cs.LG q-bio.GN q-bio.QMcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Processing a long sequence does not guarantee that distant information remains usable. As context grows, a fixed-size memory must retain many associations, connect information across positions, and preserve relevant structure without being overwhelmed by everything it observes. These are distinct requirements: a memory may store more information without representing the relationships needed for retrieval, and it may transport those relationships without preserving the ones that matter. Thus, the challenge is not simply extending context length, but constructing a memory that remains usable as context grows. We study this problem in large-chunk test-time training (TTT) and identify two basic failures: single-step writes accumulate interference, limiting capacity, while self-associative writes cannot form cross-position bindings. We introduce Double-Take (DT), which repairs these failures with multi-step unpinned updates and cross-position mixing, and adds bidirectional change-sensitive writes for selective retention. Capacity alone leaves end-to-end recall at the 0.10 chance floor; adding binding raises it to 0.92. Trained only on 32,kb genomic contexts, DT reaches 0.927 AUROC at 131,kb and 0.856 near 1,Mb, while transferring zero-shot from human to mouse. Together, these results identify capacity, binding, and selectivity as three requirements for usable long-range memory.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Oct 2026.

Builds on

19 of 24 references.

References · 19

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2023Mamba: Linear-Time Sequence Modeling with Selective State Spacescited by 4,718
  3. 2023Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contextscited by 3,455
  4. 2024RULER: What's the Real Context Size of Your Long-Context Language Models?cited by 1,346
  5. 2019Compressive Transformers for Long-Range Sequence Modellingcited by 726
  6. 2024Gated Delta Networks: Improving Mamba2 with Delta Rulecited by 532
  7. 2021Linear Transformers Are Secretly Fast Weight Programmerscited by 502
  8. 2024Parallelizing Linear Transformers with the Delta Rule over Sequence Lengthcited by 396
  9. 2023Hyena Hierarchy: Towards Larger Convolutional Language Modelscited by 393
  10. 2024Learning to (Learn at Test Time): RNNs with Expressive Hidden Statescited by 355
  11. 2024Titans: Learning to Memorize at Test Timecited by 328
  12. 2022Memorizing Transformerscited by 226
7 more
  1. 2024Repeat After Me: Transformers are Better than State Space Models at Copyingcited by 216
  2. 2024Simple linear attention language models balance the recall-throughput tradeoffcited by 208
  3. 2023Zoology: Measuring and Improving Recall in Efficient Language Modelscited by 204
  4. 2023HyenaDNA: Long-Range Genomic Sequence Modeling at Single Nucleotide Resolutioncited by 194
  5. 2016Using Fast Weights to Attend to the Recent Pastcited by 170
  6. 2025Test-Time Training Done Rightcited by 130
  7. 2024Caduceus: Bi-Directional Equivariant Long-Range DNA Sequence Modelingcited by 113

Built on by

Not cited yet.