STAPLE: Static Sparse Upcycling of Pretrained Checkpoints via Embedding Modules
On the map: Mixture-of-experts → Efficient MoE training and inference systems also fits: Expert routing strategies
Abstract (arXiv)
Sparse computation can scale the parametric capacity of LLMs without proportionally increasing active computation, but pretraining sparse architectures remains expensive and data-hungry. Existing sparse upcycling methods mainly target Mixture-of-Experts models, where expert homogeneity, sample inefficiency, and system overheads can limit practical scalability. Static sparse memory offers predictable access and token-specific updates that can help address these challenges, but naively integrating it into pretrained computation yields poor returns. In this work, we introduce STAPLE, a recipe built upon STEM for integrating static sparse memory into pretrained models. Whereas STEM replaces FFN up-projections with token-indexed embeddings, STAPLE retains them and adds the embeddings as a residual pathway, preserving pretrained computation while learning complementary token-specific information in a scalable manner. On OLMo-2 1B, STAPLE improves over continued dense training by 4.27 points on HumanEval, 2.80 on MBPP, 2.27 on GSM8K, and 1.65 on DROP. Average performance increases with static capacity, and improvements persist on the larger OLMo-2 7B backbone. STAPLE also outperforms static sparse baselines such as STEM and an Engram-style model, and achieves a higher average score than an MoE upcycling baseline while decoding 2x faster with less than half its GPU model memory and measured GPU energy per token in our throughput-oriented decoding evaluation. Importantly, despite introducing billions of parameters late in training, our host-offloaded implementation keeps generation throughput within 1.5% and training throughput within 3% of the dense baseline, while caching only the ~5% most frequent embeddings on GPU. These results show that static sparse memory can provide a sample-efficient, scalable, and sustainable path for expanding pretrained models without sparse pretraining from scratch.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Efficient MoE training and inference systems, one of 12 directions in Mixture-of-experts. Builds on 28 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Oct 2026.
Builds on
28 of 36 references.
References · 28
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
- 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,320
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
- 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,886
- 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,100
- 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,780
- 2021Program Synthesis with Large Language Modelscited by 3,637
- 2022Fast Inference from Transformers via Speculative Decodingcited by 1,653
- 2019DROP: A Reading Comprehension Benchmark Requiring Discrete Reasoning Over Paragraphscited by 903
16 more
- 2025FlashInfer: Efficient and Customizable Attention Engine for LLM Inference Servingcited by 258
- 2022Sparse Upcycling: Training Mixture-of-Experts from Dense Checkpointscited by 209
- 2019Large Memory Layers with Product Keyscited by 124
- 2024Branch-Train-MiX: Mixing Expert LLMs into a Mixture-of-Experts LLMcited by 109
- 2026Conditional Memory via Scalable Lookup: A New Axis of Sparsity for Large Language Modelscited by 86
- 2022Zeus: Understanding and Optimizing GPU Energy Consumption of DNN Trainingcited by 79
- 2024Upcycling Large Language Models into Mixture of Expertscited by 49
- 2026On the Design of Qwen3.8-Next Architecture: Evaluation, Efficiency, and Training Stabilitycited by 35
- 2025Drop-Upcycling: Training Sparse Mixture of Experts with Partial Re-initializationcited by 24
- 2019Evaluating Computational Language Models with Scaling Properties of Natural Languagecited by 22
- 2025Scaling Laws for Upcycling Mixture-of-Experts Language Modelscited by 13
- 2026STEM: Scaling Transformers with Embedding Modulescited by 12
- 2026MeKi: Memory-based Expert Knowledge Injection for Efficient LLM Scalingcited by 7
- 2026JTok: On Token Embedding as another Axis of Scaling Law via Joint Token Self-modulationcited by 3
- 2024Sparse Upcycling: Inference Inefficient Finetuningcited by 2
- 2025Dirichlet-Prior Shaping: Guiding Expert Specialization in Upcycled MoEscited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024MoC-System: Efficient Fault Tolerance for Sparse Mixture-of-Experts Model Training
- 2024Sparse Checkpointing for Fast and Reliable MoE Training
- 2025MoE-PHDS: One MoE checkpoint for flexible runtime sparsity
- 2026EMO: Frustratingly Easy Progressive Training of Extendable MoE
- 2026MASKerade: Token-Routed Mask Experts for Dense-to-MoE Upcycling
- 2026DivMoE: Fine-Grained MoE Upcycling via Cross-Domain Expert Composition
- 2026FineRMoE: Dimension Expansion for Finer-Grained Expert with Its Upcycling Approach
- 2024Llama 3 Meets MoE: Efficient Upcycling