Safe, Persistent, and Evolving Agent Harness for Understanding Partially Observable Worlds
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language model agents can invoke tools fluently, but enterprise workflows demand more than selecting the right tools: actions must strictly comply with organizational policies, tool feedback often conceals hidden side effects under partial observability, and long-horizon tasks require persistent state tracking across multiple records. To address these challenges, we introduce E-Ledger, a multi-agent harness for safe and persistent execution. E-Ledger employs a code approval layer that checks every proposed action against policy before execution, and maintains a world ledger of verified hidden rules alongside evidence-backed dynamic state. Because hidden rules are typically unknown a priori, we further propose WorldAbduct, an abductive, world-model-driven harness evolution framework. WorldAbduct diagnoses execution trajectories across four complementary views (state consistency, world-observation gap, policy-gate correctness, and goal judgment) to hypothesize latent rules, and verifies them through targeted abductive interactions before integrating them into the ledger. On the enterprise benchmark World of Workflows, E-Ledger with WorldAbduct improves safe task completion across four LLM backbones, outperforming the strongest evolution baseline by 5--15 percentage points. Experiments in ScienceWorld and DiscoveryWorld further show that abductive harness evolution carries over to scientific environments. Our code is available at https://github.com/HKUST-KnowComp/E-LEDGER-WorldAbduct.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Oct 2026.
Builds on
22 of 28 references.
References · 22
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
- 2026DeepSeek-V4: Towards Highly Efficient Million-Token Context Intelligencecited by 877
- 2026GLM-5: from Vibe Coding to Agentic Engineeringcited by 502
- 2024WorkArena: How Capable Are Web Agents at Solving Common Knowledge Work Tasks?cited by 348
- 2024TextGrad: Automatic "Differentiation" via Textcited by 250
- 2026Meta-Harness: End-to-End Optimization of Model Harnessescited by 248
- 2024AnyTool: Self-Reflective, Hierarchical Agents for Large-Scale API Callscited by 121
- 2026Agentic Harness Engineering: Observability-Driven Automatic Evolution of Coding-Agent Harnessescited by 119
- 2026Kimi K3: Open Frontier Intelligencecited by 99
- 2026Harness-Bench: Measuring Harness Effects across Models in Realistic Agent Workflowscited by 44
- 2026Code as Agent Harnesscited by 40
- 2026Agent-World: Scaling Real-World Environment Synthesis for Evolving General Agent Intelligencecited by 35
10 more
- 2025MCPToolBench++: A Large Scale AI Agent Model Context Protocol MCP Tool Use Benchmarkcited by 30
- 2025API Agents vs. GUI Agents: Divergence and Convergencecited by 28
- 2025Enterprise Deep Research: Steerable Multi-Agent Deep Research for Enterprise Analyticscited by 20
- 2026MemoHarness: Agent Harnesses That Learn from Experiencecited by 14
- 2025Top Ten Challenges Towards Agentic Neural Graph Databasescited by 13
- 2026TTHE: Test-Time Harness Evolutioncited by 12
- 2026World of Workflows: A Benchmark for Bringing World Models to Enterprise Systemscited by 10
- 2026PatchWorld: Gradient-Free Optimization of Executable World Models for Agent Environmentscited by 5
- 2026Self-Evolving World Models for LLM Agent Planningcited by 5
- 2026SING: Synthetic Intention Graph for Scalable Active Tool Discovery in LLM Agentscited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.