mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

EvoSim: Learning to Model, Modeling to Learn

arXiv 2610.11344 ↗First posted 8 Oct 2026cs.AI cs.CEcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Physics-based models connect scientific explanation with quantitative prediction. Constructing them requires selecting physical processes, defining states and governing equations, specifying couplings, and identifying parameters from experiments. Existing AI systems remain limited in making these model structure decisions autonomously. We introduce EvoSim, a self-evolving AI scientist for physical modeling. It uses experimental discrepancies to drive mechanism and equation revisions and held-out experimental data to test physical plausibility. Exploration traces make updates to knowledge, skills, and multi-agent orchestration. This co-evolution improves physics-based models and EvoSim's ability to select mechanisms, diagnose failures, and coordinate research. We evaluate EvoSim on two industrial battery modeling tasks. It predicts lithium-metal-plating onset from 25 to 45 degrees Celsius and 2 C to 6 C with a mean absolute error of 1.79% in state of charge. Dynamic voltage prediction under vehicle driving conditions achieves a root mean square error of 7.62 mV, surpassing the reported accuracy of models developed by human experts. Self-evolution reduces model and physics errors by approximately 36% relative to baseline, demonstrating improved scientific modeling capability. EvoSim turns experimental observations into validated models and cumulative research expertise.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Oct 2026.

Builds on

7 of 28 references.

References · 7

  1. 2026EvoScientist: Towards Multi-Agent Evolving AI Scientists for End-to-End Scientific Discoverycited by 51
  2. 2025NewtonBench: Benchmarking Generalizable Scientific Law Discovery in LLM Agentscited by 36
  3. 2025SR-Scientist: Scientific Equation Discovery With Agentic AIcited by 35
  4. 2025FEABench: Evaluating Language Models on Multiphysics Reasoning Abilitycited by 22
  5. 2026The Illusion of Multi-Agent Advantagecited by 9
  6. 2026Auto-Configuring Scientific Simulators with Lightweight Coding-Agent Adapterscited by 2
  7. 2026Does Multi-Agent Debate Improve AI Feedback on Research Papers?cited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.