mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Phonological Interference in Multilingual Speech Models

arXiv 2610.11275 ↗First posted 8 Oct 2026cs.CL cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Phoneme-level models transcribe or generate speech as a sequence of phonemes, the smallest sound units that distinguish words. These models enable fine-grained pronunciation control and understanding, yet often fail on input that does not match any single training language, such as speech alternating between two languages, known as code-switching, or low-resource languages absent from training. We identify a systematic failure mode behind this, phonological interference: models assume the input is in a single language and impose its phonology, overriding local phoneme-level decisions that conflict with the assumed language. We measure interference by how often a model retains phonemes that one language has but the other lacks. On code-switched input, two phone recognizers (speech-to-phoneme models) and a phoneme-conditioned text-to-speech model lose 32% to 79% of these phonemes, but lose far fewer of the phonemes both languages share. On unseen languages, we find that phone recognizers impose the phonology of the training language they assign to the speech, and the more confident the assignment, the more they lose phonemes the unseen language has but the assigned language lacks. We probe the models' language estimate from their internal activations, and trace interference to a low dimensional subspace. On monolingual speech, steering this subspace toward another language makes the model lose the phonemes that only the original language uses and produce phonemes that only the target language has. We introduce windowed language estimation (WLE), an inference time repair that replaces the model's language estimate in this subspace with one computed from a short window around each position. On code-switched input, WLE removes 34% to 69% of the interference in all three models, and in the recognizers it leaves monolingual performance essentially unchanged.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Oct 2026.

Builds on

9 of 51 references.

References · 9

  1. 2024Qwen2 Technical Reportcited by 2,076
  2. 2025CosyVoice 3: Towards In-the-wild Speech Generation via Scaling-up and Post-trainingcited by 142
  3. 2024Self-Supervised Speech Representations are More Phonetic than Semanticcited by 70
  4. 2023Probing self-supervised speech models for phonetic and phonemic information: a case study in aspirationcited by 35
  5. 2025ZIPA: A family of efficient models for multilingual phone recognitioncited by 18
  6. 2025CS-FLEURS: A Massively Multilingual and Code-Switched Speech Datasetcited by 11
  7. 2026An Empirical Recipe for Universal Phone Recognitioncited by 5
  8. 2025Generalized Multilingual Text-to-Speech Generation with Language-Aware Style Adaptationcited by 3
  9. 2026Code-Switching Reveals Language Anchoring in Multilingual LLMscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.