WorldFact-Bench: Beyond Image-Internal Plausibility to Image-World Consistency
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Advances in image generation have made visual authenticity increasingly difficult to assess. Although image forensics now examines both generation artifacts and higher-level visual inconsistencies, a plausible image can still contradict real-world facts or rules. We introduce WorldFact-Bench to evaluate image-world consistency from a single image, without a predefined claim or verification target. The benchmark contains 1,274 source-aligned real-fake pairs across four verification regimes and ten semantic domains. Each pair introduces a specific, evidence-supported factual conflict while seeking to preserve non-target content and visual plausibility. Images are evaluated independently, and pair accuracy requires both members of a pair to be classified correctly. We further propose PERSIST-Agent, which organizes iterative verification around a persistent state linking candidate facts, visual observations, evidence, and verification statuses. This state guides subsequent inspection and retrieval while retaining unresolved candidates. With backbone weights fixed, harness self-optimization refines the agent's prompts and execution rules through validation feedback. Experiments reveal strong label biases in several detectors and uneven gains from retrieval. On the evaluated 8B backbones, PERSIST-Agent improves pair accuracy over both direct judgment and retrieval-augmented baselines, while ablations support the role of persistent verification state. These findings highlight the value of state-guided verification and the remaining gap between visual plausibility and factual correctness.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Oct 2026.
Builds on
14 of 24 references.
References · 14
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
- 2025GEPA: Reflective Prompt Evolution Can Outperform Reinforcement Learningcited by 542
- 2023GenImage: A Million-Scale Benchmark for Detecting AI-Generated Imagecited by 321
- 2024A Sanity Check for AI-generated Image Detectioncited by 189
- 2024Orthogonal Subspace Decomposition for Generalizable AI-Generated Image Detectioncited by 105
- 2025Spot the Fake: Large Multimodal Model-Based Synthetic Image Detection with Artifact Explanationcited by 68
- 2025Veritas: Generalizable Deepfake Detection via Pattern-Aware Reasoningcited by 23
- 2025ForensicHub: A Unified Benchmark & Codebase for All-Domain Fake Image Detection and Localizationcited by 22
- 2025AVerImaTeC: A Dataset for Automatic Verification of Image-Text Claims with Evidence from the Webcited by 18
- 2024MFC-Bench: Benchmarking Multimodal Fact-Checking with Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 15
- 2024T2I-FactualBench: Benchmarking the Factuality of Text-to-Image Models with Knowledge-Intensive Conceptscited by 14
- 2026Where Detectors Fail: Probing Generative Space for Generalizable AI-Generated Image Detectioncited by 5
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026False Claims, Credible Images: A Red-Teaming Benchmark for Commercial Image Generators
- 2026EviScene: Beyond "Is It AI?" for Agentic Image Factuality Assessment
- 2026MIC: Explaining Image-Claim Inconsistencies in AI-Generated Multimodal Misinformation
- 2026TerraVis: Towards Evaluation of World-Grounded Visual Consistency in Text-to-Image Generation via MLLM Workflows
- 2025REVEAL -- Reasoning and Evaluation of Visual Evidence through Aligned Language
- 2024FakeBench: Probing Explainable Fake Image Detection via Large Multimodal Models
- 2026Fact or Fake? Assessing the Role of Deepfake Detectors in Multimodal Misinformation Detection
- 2026Rethinking Visual Provenance: Detection and Watermarking Across Direct Visual Generation and LLM-Driven Code Rendering