SFT-as-Context Mitigates Forgetting in Supervised Fine-Tuning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Supervised fine-tuning (SFT) equips large language models (LLMs) with specialized capabilities, but often comes at the cost of forgetting the general capabilities of their parent models (i.e., the pretrained models before fine-tuning). This trade-off is especially limiting for queries that require both specialized and general capabilities. We introduce SFT-as-context, a training-free method in which the parent model uses the SFT model's response as context to answer the query. This allows the parent model to acquire fine-tuned capabilities from the SFT response through in-context learning while preserving its own general capabilities. Across 19 parent-SFT model pairs and 11 benchmarks, SFT-as-context remains close to the SFT models on fine-tuned capabilities, with gaps of only 2.2 and 2.1 percentage points on AIME 2024 and LiveCodeBench and 2.0 macro MAE on NutriBench-English, while staying within 2.2 percentage points of the parent models on general capabilities on average. Remarkably, it can solve queries requiring both fine-tuned and general capabilities, even when neither the parent nor SFT model succeeds alone. This approach also extends beyond parent-SFT pairs: responses from a small open-source SFT model can improve a strong closed-source LLM, outperforming either model alone. Furthermore, we use a Bayesian framework to derive theoretical guarantees that bound the error of SFT-as-context relative to the SFT model on fine-tuned capabilities and to the parent model on general capabilities. In addition, we visualize the attention weights and find that the parent model attends more to useful SFT responses and less to irrelevant ones, suggesting that selective attention helps the parent model use the SFT response through in-context learning.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Oct 2026.
Builds on
11 of 58 references.
References · 11
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
- 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,330
- 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,942
- 2023Instruction-Following Evaluation for Large Language Modelscited by 1,228
- 2024Qwen2.5-Coder Technical Reportcited by 1,203
- 2026Gemma 4 Technical Reportcited by 259
- 2025Skywork Open Reasoner 1 Technical Reportcited by 165
- 2025An Empirical Study on Eliciting and Improving R1-like Reasoning Modelscited by 78
- 2024Unveiling the Statistical Foundations of Chain-of-Thought Prompting Methodscited by 29
- 2026CPR for LLMs: Critical-Point Routing against Catastrophic Forgetting in Domain Adaptationcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.